User talk:NL19931993

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, NL19931993, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Learn from others
• Be kind to others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us a bit about yourself
• Our great guide to Wikipedia

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains^(talk) 14:45, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Tip of the day...

When not to use links

It is possible to create links to every word in an article. But providing too many defeats their purpose by obscuring the most relevant links. Here's an example of overlinking:

Wikipedia's greatness stems from being able to link articles together easily, but don't overdo it. It can get really annoying and does not help the reader.

The above passage hides the relevant link. Compare that with this:

Wikipedia's greatness stems from being able to link articles together easily, but don't overdo it. It can get really annoying and does not help the reader.

For notices that can be added to articles, see Template:Overlinked and Template:Underlinked.

Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip

Read more:

Only make links that are relevant to the context  

How to create a link  

Become a Wikipedia tipster

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Two comments on your AfD nominations

Hello, I noticed a few issues with your recent nominations at Articles for deletion:

1. Please consider using Twinkle or another automated tool to nominated articles for deletion. At the very least, please use {{afd2}} template as described at WP:AFD ({{subst:afd2 | pg=PageName | cat=Category | text=Why the page should be deleted}} ~~~~). The hand-crafted AfDs you created have created contain several broken links. Today's nominations point to the 2019 January 6 deletion log, not 2020. The "View AfD" link points to the wrong debate on 2nd nominations. See changes made to the Jiz Lee debate.
2. Please use edit summaries. That is especially important when you tag an article for deletion. WP:AFD suggests: AfD: Nominated for deletion; see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NominationName]]. On a proposed deletion, "PROD" will suffice. Thank you for your contributions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

NL19931993 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am under total indefinite block for no reason, no notification of investigation, I have nothing but constructive edits here, IP does not definitively prove, edits history of account should be considered and there are no issues with my edits

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am under total indefinite block for no reason, no notification of investigation, I have nothing but constructive edits here, IP does not definitively prove, edits history of account should be considered and there are no issues with my edits |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am under total indefinite block for no reason, no notification of investigation, I have nothing but constructive edits here, IP does not definitively prove, edits history of account should be considered and there are no issues with my edits |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am under total indefinite block for no reason, no notification of investigation, I have nothing but constructive edits here, IP does not definitively prove, edits history of account should be considered and there are no issues with my edits |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}