Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anoncopeucus: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ultraexactzz (talk | contribs) Sorting as Science (species), and commenting as Keep |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[:Anoncopeucus]]=== |
===[[:Anoncopeucus]]=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD| |
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|t}} |
||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Keep'''. Pretty much all valid/accepted genera are notable and worthy of inclusion as encyclopedia articles (see WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES). I also expanded the article a bit. —[[User:Hyperik|Hyperik]] <span style="font-size:80%">⌜[[User talk:Hyperik|talk]]⌟</span> 01:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''. Pretty much all valid/accepted genera are notable and worthy of inclusion as encyclopedia articles (see WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES). I also expanded the article a bit. —[[User:Hyperik|Hyperik]] <span style="font-size:80%">⌜[[User talk:Hyperik|talk]]⌟</span> 01:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. Name genera are notable. Searching in google book brings up sources, and regardless per [[WP:5P1]] Wikipedia is also a gazetteer, and this article falls within that.--[[User:Eostrix|Eostrix]] ([[User talk:Eostrix|talk]]) 07:42, 23 February 2020 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''. Name genera are notable. Searching in google book brings up sources, and regardless per [[WP:5P1]] Wikipedia is also a gazetteer, and this article falls within that.--[[User:Eostrix|Eostrix]] ([[User talk:Eostrix|talk]]) 07:42, 23 February 2020 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' as per the above. [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Said]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Did]] </small> 15:10, 24 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:10, 24 February 2020
Anoncopeucus
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Anoncopeucus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There has been almost nothing in the article since 2011. It only has one reference, and isn't notable. Analog Horror, (Communicate) 06:39, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 February 22. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:04, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:48, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - doesn’t seem like WP:BEFORE was done, there are links in in the taxonbar. Also see WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES. --awkwafaba (📥) 14:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Pretty much all valid/accepted genera are notable and worthy of inclusion as encyclopedia articles (see WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES). I also expanded the article a bit. —Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 01:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Name genera are notable. Searching in google book brings up sources, and regardless per WP:5P1 Wikipedia is also a gazetteer, and this article falls within that.--Eostrix (talk) 07:42, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep as per the above. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:10, 24 February 2020 (UTC)