User talk:Electrofying

Invitation to join WikiProject Military history

Hello Electrofying! Thank you for your contributions to military history-related articles.

If you would be interested in joining a group of editors who are also working on military history topics, please take a look at the WikiProject Military history—we would be delighted to have you! If you like what you see, please add your username here, and a project coordinator will soon be along to welcome you. If you're not sure about joining, why not sign up to receive our monthly newsletter, The Bugle? It is a great way to get a feel for the project. Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:36, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

You are welcome.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:55, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:INS Imphal

Hello, Mayank Prasoon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "INS Imphal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:04, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Okay you can delete it.

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Mig-27 in IAF

Hey, I saw your edits at No. 29 Squadron IAF. Do you know the status of No. 10 Squadron IAF? —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 01:58, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

No, i could not find any reference for no. 10 squadron...but their are few references stating that no 10 squadron is a MiG 27 squadron based at jodhpur...although some of them are not WP:RS 1)https://military.wikia.org/wiki/No._10_Squadron_IAF 2)https://idsa.in/issuebrief/the-indian-air-force-declining-squadron-strength_sbmaharaj_031117 3)https://m-economictimes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/m.economictimes.com/news/defence/three-mig-21-mig-27-squadrons-to-be-phased-out-by-iaf-this-year/amp_articleshow/47849954.cms?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15775939100171&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fm.economictimes.com%2Fnews%2Fdefence%2Fthree-mig-21-mig-27-squadrons-to-be-phased-out-by-iaf-this-year%2Farticleshow%2F47849954.cms It is very likely that this squadron must have been retired in 2018 or in early 2019....as their are mentions of 2 squadrons of MiG 27 based at Jodhpur till 2017 in second reference..and as mentioned in the 3rd reference of economic times the squadron might have been retired in 2018 as in 2017 there were only 2 squadrons present in 2017...also the new refernces of TOI,Economic Times state that no 29 squadron was the last squadron of MiG 27 of IAF. Thats all i could say for now. Mayank Prasoon (talk) 04:43, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Right. I did find one mention of 10 squadron in deccan herald's report, that 10 sqn and 29 sqn were upgraded while the older mig-27's were phased out by 2017. Thanks for those links. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 07:01, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

No Problem Mayank Prasoon (talk) 08:28, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to Milhist!

Hello Electrofying and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
• If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:58, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Need some one with experience in reviewing Indian military personnel articles

Hello, I came across your name on the military page. I need someone with experience in reviewing military personnel wiki articles who can improve my recently approved article. Can you help me with that or point me to someone who can. Appreciate your help on this. Manas.chafekar (talk) 00:56, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Well if you could send me some of your Military articles then i could see where i can help you the best. Electrofying (talk) 05:22, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

sure. The article I was referring to is Suryakant Chintaman Chafekar. Apologies for the late reply. Manas.chafekar (talk) 17:21, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi Electrofying, hope you are doing fine in the CoViD 19 pandamic. A gentle reminder to review the comments on my wiki page contribution Suryakant Chintaman Chafekar.Manas.chafekar (talk) 15:03, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from India and weapons of mass destruction into Strategic Forces Command. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:51, 3 March 2020 (UTC)