User talk:Joshua Jonathan: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:01, 9 April 2020

en:User:Joshua Jonathan/Buddha/message

Historical reliability of gospels

So you think this guy might be a sock? Any idea of who?--Ermenrich (talk) 16:45, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ermenrich: same pov as GoogleMeNowPlease. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 17:31, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Typo

One more misleading edit like this, which is blatant pov-pushing, and I'll report you to ANI. Avdmoh (talk) 08:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Typo

One more misleading edit like this, which is blatant pov-pushing, and I'll report you to ANI. Avdmoh (talk) 09:01, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: could you take a look here? Thanks. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 10:53, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Avdmoh: go ahead if you really think you have a case. But these threats are obviously retaliation for warnings on your talk page, and I'm still considering blocking you after looking at your edits and the warnings you've had. At this rate it's only a matter of time. Doug Weller talk 11:44, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting Edits to Dashavatara

To be continued at Talk:Dashavatara#Reverting Edits to Dashavatara

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hello Joshua,

It seems you reverted most of my edits to dashavatara, including to restore sections that were re-written because they contain false information, spelling mistakes, false links, etc. I am a little confused as to why? Carlduff (talk) 20:58, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Resurrection appearances

Template:Resurrection appearances has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. PPEMES (talk) 15:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fringe edits and possible sock

Hello, I got awareness of fringe edits by Hunan201p (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Hunan201p) promotion racist ideas of “blonde haired and blue eyed” warriors in East Asia. His used references do not support these claims and only mention unknown origin in the case of the Xianbei. More fringe are his edits on blonde (hair) or Genghis Khan (also see talkpage). Rashid al-din did not say Genghis jad red heir, but wrote about Genghis reaction to the skin colour of his grandchild which was not reddish but swarty. I have included the direct quote and a link yesterday, but currently no one has reacted. I m writing you because you seem to be good editor and knowledgeable on Wikipedia rules. I think many edits of Hunan violate WP:SCIRS and WP:WEIGHT. Additionally some things about him remember me on the long term vandal Tirgil34 (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Tirgil34). I mean blonde or red haired turks are his main target, as seemingly Hunan. Anyway l, someone should watch this user carefully. Best regards.38.121.43.208 (talk) 15:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 == Nomination for deletion of Template:Resurrection appearances ==
 [[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|30px|link=]][[Template:Resurrection appearances]] has been [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|nominated for deletion]]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 April 8#Template:Resurrection appearances|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> [[User:PPEMES|PPEMES]] ([[User talk:PPEMES|talk]]) 15:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
+== Fringe edits and possible sock ==
+Hello, I got awareness of fringe edits by Hunan201p (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Hunan201p) promotion racist ideas of “blonde haired and blue eyed” warriors in East Asia. His used references do not support these claims and only mention unknown origin in the case of the [[Xianbei]]. More fringe are his edits on [[blonde (hair)]] or [[Genghis Khan]] (also see talkpage). Rashid al-din did not say Genghis jad red heir, but wrote about Genghis reaction to the skin colour of his grandchild which was not reddish but swarty. I have included the direct quote and a link yesterday, but currently no one has reacted. I m writing you because you seem to be good editor and knowledgeable on Wikipedia rules. I think many edits of Hunan violate [[WP:SCIRS]] and [[WP:WEIGHT]]. Additionally some things about him remember me on the long term vandal Tirgil34 (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Tirgil34). I mean blonde or red haired turks are his main target, as seemingly Hunan. Anyway l, someone should watch this user carefully. Best regards.[[Special:Contributions/38.121.43.208|38.121.43.208]] ([[User talk:38.121.43.208|talk]]) 15:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)