Talk:Warner Chappell Music: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:55, 8 May 2020

Companies Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Sony acquisition

I am confused. I had read that Warner Music had been acquired by Sony. What happened to that bit of history? Is this group still part of Sony? Did they split off again? This is so incomplete.

Also Standford just did a bunch of interviews with people from this company that might be referenced in this article

http://ecorner.stanford.edu/authorMaterialInfo.html?mid=3272
http://vimeo.com/91949870
http://vimeo.com/93198822

Pronunciation

Can someone knowledgeable add something about the pronunciation of 'Chappell'? Is it like Dave Chappelle or Chapel Hill? ... Or something else? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:642:C103:6590:81E4:8790:FB5D:A81E (talk) 19:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright claims

There seems to be more automated claims from this company, the last one being Mumbo Jumbo (YouTube creator) whom around 400 videos got claimed in 2 hours on 19/04/2019^[1] with no actual copyright infringement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dododingo (talk • contribs) 18:13, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://twitter.com/ThatMumboJumbo/status/1130009515766755328

Copyright Claims against Mumbo Jumbo (3)

Hello everyone, an addition about Mumbo Jumbo case. I don't know if this article can be used as a reliable source for this subject. I will let you juge. https://5mag.net/news/mumbo-jumbo-youtube-copyright-warner-chappell/^[1] Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.89.40.232 (talk) 19:00, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's necessarily a question about whether we can find reliable sources for this, but rather if it even needs to be mentioned in the article. My guess is that at some point this week either a WC or YouTube rep will realize they screwed something up, apologise, and we'll never hear another word about it. It's not really significant until it gets significant/sustained coverage; a week from now I doubt anyone will even remember it happened (except those reading this talk page). Primefac (talk) 19:27, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://5mag.net/news/mumbo-jumbo-youtube-copyright-warner-chappell/

At a cursory glance in recent times, its almost in the past, neither company have said much and it is still being referenced altough to a much lesser degree. Usx9 (talk) 15:34, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Even now, this is still talked about. For instance, in Tom Scott's relatively recent YouTube video on copyright infringement on YouTube, he used it as a prime example. I think it should be added to the article, with the following source: https://reclaimthenet.org/mumbo-jumbo-youtube-copyright-claims/^[1] 19:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

^ https://reclaimthenet.org/mumbo-jumbo-youtube-copyright-claims/

[1] ttps://twitter.com/ThatMumboJumbo/status/1130009515766755328

[2] ttps://5mag.net/news/mumbo-jumbo-youtube-copyright-warner-chappell/

[3] ttps://reclaimthenet.org/mumbo-jumbo-youtube-copyright-claims/

[1]

[1]

[1]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 There seems to be more automated claims from this company, the last one being Mumbo Jumbo (YouTube creator) whom around 400 videos got claimed in 2 hours on 19/04/2019<ref>https://twitter.com/ThatMumboJumbo/status/1130009515766755328</ref> with no actual copyright infringement. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dododingo|Dododingo]] ([[User talk:Dododingo#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dododingo|contribs]]) 18:13, 19 May 2019 (UTC)</small>
 {{reflist-talk}}
-== wrong claims (2) ==
+== Copyright Claims against Mumbo Jumbo (3) ==
 Hello everyone,
@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 At a cursory glance in recent times, its almost in the past, neither company have said much and it is still being referenced altough to a much lesser degree. [[User:Usx9|Usx9]] ([[User talk:Usx9|talk]]) 15:34, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
+Even now, this is still talked about. For instance, in Tom Scott's relatively recent YouTube video on copyright infringement on YouTube, he used it as a prime example. I think it should be added to the article, with the following source: https://reclaimthenet.org/mumbo-jumbo-youtube-copyright-claims/<ref>https://reclaimthenet.org/mumbo-jumbo-youtube-copyright-claims/</ref> 19:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)