Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chinese-proti: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:21, 2 June 2020

Chinese-proti

Chinese-proti (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chinese-proti/Archive.

30 May 2020

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets

Montalk123 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Bablos939 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Maomao4321 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Per WP:DUCK. Bablos939 has a single-minded focus on prostitution and interracial mixing involving Chinese women, exactly like Chinese-proti and his sockpuppets. Bamnamu (talk) 01:52, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

The ip 41.34.93.140 has denounced Bablos939 as a sock of Montalk123 who was banned only two months ago and requested it get added to the sockpuppet investigation here [1] [2]. His account is not stale but fresh.

41.34.93.140's reasons are

"If you look at his contribution all of his early contribution in the Yuan dynasty, Imperial Chinese harem system, Qing dynasty, Goryeo under Mongol rule, Heqin it's all about removing Korean women but only editing Chinese women with foreign men. I suggest we edit on Korean women interracial marriages if he continues because I can clearly see he is just cherrypicking on Chinese women in all his interracial marriage edits."

For example in women in China, he intentionally removed Korean women"

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Women_in_China&diff=prev&oldid=946480356

Watersinfalls (talk) 17:08, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do think that Bablos939 is Chinese-proti like other editor suggested but I also agree with the other eidtor that Babloss939 is MaoMao4321.

I 100% believe ( with strong evidence ) Bablos939 is Maomao4321 and Montalk123 just like the other user suggested but even more is Maomao4321.

Maomao4321, Blablos939, Maomao4321 all have one thing in commons.

1) They all numbers in the end. 2) They all write Chinese women.

I believe they all share similar IP locations (possibly either from Korea some close city locations).

I say this based on factual the evidence that both of the google book link shows Korean google translations when they were posting their sources. A user out of nowhere like Maomao4321 just decide to come in and post exact same Korean translation links, same points, same defence. 41.232.35.139 (talk) 20:03, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

allkpop Forums Menu

Conversations Last edit ( a message to end all conversation, disputes ) Mark as Unread Star Conversation Leave Conversation < Prev12 ThenewbieofKpop ThenewbieofKpop Public Figure Wendy_Reveluv said: ↑ I did it :) Thanks. Sorry to bother you again. I just need to make 1 small correction

At the very bottom of the link you posted https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Miscegenation&action=edit&section=2

Do you see this

As for Peruvian Chinese, I suggest you look at their physical descendants and you will see many Chinese Peruvian look mix between Chinese and Peruvian https://www.ned.org/wp-content/uplo...Power-Rising-Authoritarian-Influence-Peru.pdf

. ThenewbieofKpop, Yesterday at 11:16 PM Report Reply Wendy_Reveluv Wendy_Reveluv Super Rookie ThenewbieofKpop said: ↑ Sorry to bother you again. No need to be sorry . I did it Wendy_Reveluv, Yesterday at 11:34 PM Report Reply ThenewbieofKpop ThenewbieofKpop Public Figure New Wendy_Reveluv said: ↑ No need to be sorry . I did it Okay. Thanks for your help again. I promise to help you back myself when you need it to.

(Copy and paste the text at the very bottom of the last sentence)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Chinese-proti&action=edit&section=3

Allow me to post evidence even more that why Blablos939 and Maomao4321 are the same person

One strong evidence is that supported for eachother using the same Korean google book link ON THE SAME DAY but Maomao4321 didn't even bother check hence the reason he made the same mistake. Aside from making the same points, having account names with numbers mixed at the end.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Interracial_marriage&diff=959678653&oldid=959677026

(A)Muslim arrivals in China during the Tang and Song Dynasties were from all accounts male. It is hard to find evidence of females coming with them.// many of them had married Chinese women.

https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=jV9_YvgUmpsC&pg=PA74&redir_esc=y&hl=ko#v=onepage&q=a many them had married chinese&f=false

Here is Maomao4321 revision edit in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Interracial_marriage&diff=959734058&oldid=959705367 And here he also posted this Korean translation google from the book link

(Fact) 1)Tang Dynasty Muslim arrivals in China during the Tang and Song Dynasties were from all accounts male. It is hard to find evidence of females coming with them.// many of them had married Chinese women.

https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=jV9_YvgUmpsC&pg=PA74&redir_esc=y&hl=ko#v=onepage&q=a many them had married chinese&f=fals

THE FACT IS. How can two people make the same mistakes and support eachother by making the same incorrect points. For example both of the link does not even say Tang Dynasty Muslim arrivals in China during the Tang and Song Dynasties were from all accounts male. It is hard to find evidence of females coming with them.....

Also you can tell that Maomao4321 did not even bother to check the Korean google book link Bablos939 edited. You can also noticed that Bablos939 Korean google book link is in tact while Maomao4321 Korean's google bok link was simply copy and pasted directly from the talk page from Bablos939, meaning Mamomao4321 didn't copy the link from inside, because if he did copy the link would be in tact and he wouldn't have made the error mistakes about about Tang dynasy and Song dynasty Muslim....

This prove he just came to write support for Bablos939 without even checking. 41.232.35.139 (talk) 00:21, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Clerk declined - There are no "fresh" socks in either sock category and the most recent report was 5 years ago. Everything available is too stale for CU.
Previous socks were more focussed on prostitution in China, Japan and North & South Korea. I'd be uncomfortable acting on a weak link to an editor focussing on prostitution elsewhere, interracial marriage, and miscegenation. Cabayi (talk) 16:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk note: - A sleeper Watersinfalls (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) has been activated to denounce Maomao4321 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) as another sock on my talk page. Cabayi (talk) 15:23, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk note: Related: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Watersinfalls -- RoySmith (talk) 16:03, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is a confusing SPI; the discussion that Bablos939, Maomao123, and Watersinfalls are having at Talk:Interracial marriage#There are many misinterpreting the source about Chinese intermarrige. is so verbose and poorly formatted, it's hard to tell who is saying what. From what I understand, Maomao123 is so far a single-purpose account that has only participated in the discussion in support of Bablos939. On that basis, I checked Maomao123 and Bablos939, and they are Possible to each other. The connection to Montalk123 is less clear to me; the relevant overlap appears to be in the topic of prostitution in China and other countries, but in comparing the editors contributions, the connection isn't obvious to me. Nevertheless, I ran a check anyway and from a technical standpoint Maomao and Bablos are Unrelated to Montalk123. Behavioural evidence needs evaluation. Mz7 (talk) 23:06, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]