Jump to content

User talk:VasuVR: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Invitation.
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Line 86: Line 86:
|auto=short
|auto=short
}}
}}

== Invite for discussion on Sector 13, Chandigarh ==


There is a [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mani_Majra#Requested_move_17_June_2020 discussion on the talk page section of Sector 13].

(Disclaimer: This is just an invite for you to participate. I neither encourage you to vote against the topic nor in the favor of the topic. This is just a neutral message for participation and It is totally your decision.)

'''Following is the brief of the topic''' :-
Manimajra was renamed as sector 13 legally by UT government of Chandigarh in January 2020 .
Below are links to the decision:-
1). https://m.timesofindia.com/city/chandigarh/manimajra-to-be-renamed-sector-13-residents-elated/amp_articleshow/73114749.cms .

2). https://www.hindustantimes.com/chandigarh/chandigarh-s-manimajra-is-now-sector-13/story-ploFPCA4UGpDu9ksUxLtdL.html


It is true that the proposal had been initially opposed in december 2019. In the initial proposal, names like Sector M or Sector 26 east were proposed.
Here is the link for initial proposals made :-

3)https://m.hindustantimes.com/chandigarh/manimajra-rwa-wants-number-not-m-after-sector/story-Q7ZPsdh5y120cEqlVAKuhP_amp.html

4)https://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-chandigarh-to-finally-get-sector-13-after-54-years-of-formation-2813378
(these articles were published in newspapers in 2019 which is old).

5)https://m.tribuneindia.com/news/archive/chandigarh/mani-majra-to-be-sector-m-863728

(This link i provided over here was published in Tribune India in November 2019 )

But soon the {{highlight | final decision was made which overruled the previous proposals and finally the new name for manimajra was concluded as sector 13 by the beginning of 2020.}}
The next link (6th Link) was also published in Tribune India with the final decision which was declared in February 2020 :-

6)https://m.tribuneindia.com/news/chandigarh/its-official-mani-majra-is-sector-13-of-chandigarh-39042

Here is an example on how to put your decision ___________.

(I do not persuade you to put decision in any side it is totally your decision)

*'''Disagree'''
*'''Oppose'''
*'''Support'''
*'''Strong Support'''
*'''Agreed'''
Click on the edit tab and please copy any 1 vote you want to put from the above or you can put your own decision(vote) which ever you want by putting a * star symbol followed by 3 apostrophe marks ' ' ' and then writing your word for vote like support, agreed etc and finally closing it with again 3 apostrophe marks ' ' ' in the end.


== Watchlist ==
== Watchlist ==

Revision as of 11:56, 19 June 2020

Nice welcome message and Useful links that I got...

Welcome others using {{Welcomeg}} (shown below) or similar templates.

Hello, VasuVR! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 09:26, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Topics

Invite for discussion on Sector 13, Chandigarh

There is a discussion on the talk page section of Sector 13.

(Disclaimer: This is just an invite for you to participate. I neither encourage you to vote against the topic nor in the favor of the topic. This is just a neutral message for participation and It is totally your decision.)

Following is the brief of the topic :- Manimajra was renamed as sector 13 legally by UT government of Chandigarh in January 2020 . Below are links to the decision:- 1). https://m.timesofindia.com/city/chandigarh/manimajra-to-be-renamed-sector-13-residents-elated/amp_articleshow/73114749.cms .

2). https://www.hindustantimes.com/chandigarh/chandigarh-s-manimajra-is-now-sector-13/story-ploFPCA4UGpDu9ksUxLtdL.html


It is true that the proposal had been initially opposed in december 2019. In the initial proposal, names like Sector M or Sector 26 east were proposed. Here is the link for initial proposals made :-

3)https://m.hindustantimes.com/chandigarh/manimajra-rwa-wants-number-not-m-after-sector/story-Q7ZPsdh5y120cEqlVAKuhP_amp.html

4)https://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-chandigarh-to-finally-get-sector-13-after-54-years-of-formation-2813378 (these articles were published in newspapers in 2019 which is old).

5)https://m.tribuneindia.com/news/archive/chandigarh/mani-majra-to-be-sector-m-863728

 (This link i provided over here was published in Tribune India in November 2019 )

But soon the final decision was made which overruled the previous proposals and finally the new name for manimajra was concluded as sector 13 by the beginning of 2020. The next link (6th Link) was also published in Tribune India with the final decision which was declared in February 2020 :-

6)https://m.tribuneindia.com/news/chandigarh/its-official-mani-majra-is-sector-13-of-chandigarh-39042

Here is an example on how to put your decision ___________.

(I do not persuade you to put decision in any side it is totally your decision) 
  • Disagree
  • Oppose
  • Support
  • Strong Support
  • Agreed

Click on the edit tab and please copy any 1 vote you want to put from the above or you can put your own decision(vote) which ever you want by putting a * star symbol followed by 3 apostrophe marks ' ' ' and then writing your word for vote like support, agreed etc and finally closing it with again 3 apostrophe marks ' ' ' in the end.

Watchlist

Hello Vasu,

Could you please add the following pages to your watchlist? Vandals/uninformed users making changes to them could introduce errors in a significant number of music-related articles.

  1. Module:Svara
  2. Module:Svara/equivalents
  3. Module:Svara/resolve
  4. Template:Svara
  5. Template:SvaraC
  6. Template:SvaraH
  7. Template:Infobox raga
  8. Template:Infobox ragam

Cheers.—Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 17:20, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cpt.a.haddock: - sure, I have added the Modules to watch list. The others were already under my watchlist. I rarely peep into Wiki now-a-days due to other things going on. Maybe in a few months time, things will settle down and I can spend more time here. Thanks.
VasuVR (talk, contribs) 05:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed to assess if maintenance template is needed anymore after 9 years of edits on a B-Class biography

Dear VasuVR, I've contributed majorly to editing a biographical page on Wikipedia called "Bhagwan Gopinath" almost 9 years back in 2011. It however got a maintenance template tagged to clean it up almost immediately and I worked diligently to bring it up to a much cleaner level in the next few months. After this, it also got assessed by you (using an AWB) on Mar 15, 2012 and also got classified as a Class-B biography. Since then, it has further undergone multiple improvement edits in the past 9 years of its existence on Wiki. I thought I'd check with you to see if you could spare some time to see if it still deserves to carry the maintenance template or can these be removed now for good. Unfortunately, the user (Cind.amuse) who tagged it with the maintenance template, though guided me through the process of clean up, has long since passed away so I thought of asking you for your second opinion since you had assessed it once already. Thanks, Warm Regards, Sharda Mandir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharda Mandir (talkcontribs) 20:54, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]