Jump to content

Talk:Khalistan movement: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Neverforget84 - "Sant Jarnail Singh: new section"
Claims on Pakistan: new section
Line 35: Line 35:
Stay safe
Stay safe
Neverforegt84 <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Neverforget84|Neverforget84]] ([[User talk:Neverforget84#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Neverforget84|contribs]]) 16:20, 10 July 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Neverforegt84 <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Neverforget84|Neverforget84]] ([[User talk:Neverforget84#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Neverforget84|contribs]]) 16:20, 10 July 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Claims on Pakistan ==

Khalistan movement has no credible claims on Pakistan, this POV is pushed by Indian nationalist and should be removed.

Revision as of 03:48, 26 July 2020

Sant Jarnail Singh

Hello,


My name Gurmukh Singh and I believe in Khalistan and I do not agree with how the text is very one-sided.Under the editing section, Wikipedia has kindly asked us to edit this article so that it is not one-sided. However I see the terms terrorist,radical and militant. Calling sant ji a terrorist was not the cleverest move. I personally think that he wasn't one and so do the vast mojority of Sikhs. The indian Government said that the was a terrorist from the years leading up to 84 due to the fact that he was gave a number of fiery speeches. If making a fiery speech makes you a terrorist then there surely are many terrorists in this world. Does this make Shakespeare a terrorist? Does it make a member of parliment a terrorist? The answer to these- NO.

The author/editor of this inacurate article have incorrectly stated that Sant Bindranwale wished for Khalistan however in an interview in 1983 when he was asked about this he said- "I am not against Khalistan, niether am I for it. If we are given it however we will take it."

I aslo notice how there were few if not no mentions of the many rapes and murders that wre commited against Sikhs in the 10 years after 1984. I would like to see this changed.


Really wishing for a debate cuz im real bored in lockdown. Stay safe Neverforegt84 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neverforget84 (talkcontribs) 16:20, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Claims on Pakistan

Khalistan movement has no credible claims on Pakistan, this POV is pushed by Indian nationalist and should be removed.