Jump to content

User talk:Shabehr: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notice: Conflict of interest on Millard Sheets.
Shabehr (talk | contribs)
m cleanup
Line 11: Line 11:
Hi Nole - Thanks for writing, and yes, I can see your point about the public art sculpture's significance in the WoF article. I only recently caught the C. Knight & K. M. Williamson critical responses, so I'm unfortunately behind the times on this piece. The only thing I can think of is that on Google Maps, the sculpture is getting used as a meeting spot for various "stealth" Hollywood tour businesses. Best of luck to you, TashaB 21:33, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi Nole - Thanks for writing, and yes, I can see your point about the public art sculpture's significance in the WoF article. I only recently caught the C. Knight & K. M. Williamson critical responses, so I'm unfortunately behind the times on this piece. The only thing I can think of is that on Google Maps, the sculpture is getting used as a meeting spot for various "stealth" Hollywood tour businesses. Best of luck to you, TashaB 21:33, 17 July 2020 (UTC)


== Nomination of [[:Public Art in Public Places]] for deletion ==
</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Public Art in Public Places]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].

The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public Art in Public Places]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> [[User:Barte|Barte]] ([[User talk:Barte|talk]]) 15:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)


== Did you vandalize my comment on the AfD for [[Public Art in Public Places]]? ==
== Did you vandalize my comment on the AfD for [[Public Art in Public Places]]? ==

Revision as of 22:22, 9 September 2020

Thank you for your edit to Levi Ponce. I wrote the article six years ago and he seems to be gaining in popularity every year. I tweaked your recent edit because you added an external link to the body of the text. I converted it to an inline reference. Please see WP:EL for details. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:08, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hollywood and La Brea Gateway

Hi Natasha, I've seen that every so often you contribute to the Hollywood and La Brea Gateway portion of the Walk of Fame article. I think that the installation may actually just warrant its own article, especially if we can find one or two more sources about it. I've had this thought for a while, as the more the section grows the less it feels like it fits in an article about the WoF. Right now there's the one main review, but I think that if we could find another piece or two like that, it could pass the notability guidelines. Would you want to expand this, and/or would you have knowledge of any more sources discussing the installation? Nole (chat·edits) 15:27, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nole - Thanks for writing, and yes, I can see your point about the public art sculpture's significance in the WoF article. I only recently caught the C. Knight & K. M. Williamson critical responses, so I'm unfortunately behind the times on this piece. The only thing I can think of is that on Google Maps, the sculpture is getting used as a meeting spot for various "stealth" Hollywood tour businesses. Best of luck to you, TashaB 21:33, 17 July 2020 (UTC)


Did you vandalize my comment on the AfD for Public Art in Public Places?

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Why did you change my comment in the AfD discussion? View you change here: [1] I have changed it back but please do not do that again. The Netherzone (talk) 18:16, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moving this here from my talk page:
Hi, I'm sorry, I'm not aware of having changed anyone's comment, and if this happened it was a mistake I wasn't aware of. Apologies and sorry for your distress, and I'm glad you quickly caught it and replaced it, whatever it was. Respectfully, TashaB (talk) 18:55, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your change is in the diff that I linked above. Here it is again, please click on the numbered diff at the end of this sentence, see in my comment above yours that you changed part of my comment into gibberish: [2] Please respond here in the future rather than my talk page. Thank you. The Netherzone (talk) 19:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'll respond once again - I read that you corrected a possible typo/edit mistake I probably made, is that right? Is there anything else I can do for you? Again, apologies. TashaB (talk) 20:34, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Information icon Hello, Shabehr. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Millard Sheets, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. You had added content to this page from the website "Public Art in Public Places", and made it a series of inline hyperlinks. Are you connected to this website? Jooojay (talk) 18:46, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]