User talk:Daemonickangaroo2018: Difference between revisions
→Edits: new section |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
An interesting read, thank you. I ticked this at NPP, but I do note that paraphrasing of [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=957321973&action=compare&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.s2a3.org.za%2Fbio%2FBiograph_final.php%3Fserial%3D1965] is a bit close. Some of it is quotes, but some of the text could be paraphrased to a greater distance.--[[User:Eostrix|Eostrix]] ([[User talk:Eostrix|talk]]) 07:54, 18 May 2020 (UTC) |
An interesting read, thank you. I ticked this at NPP, but I do note that paraphrasing of [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=957321973&action=compare&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.s2a3.org.za%2Fbio%2FBiograph_final.php%3Fserial%3D1965] is a bit close. Some of it is quotes, but some of the text could be paraphrased to a greater distance.--[[User:Eostrix|Eostrix]] ([[User talk:Eostrix|talk]]) 07:54, 18 May 2020 (UTC) |
||
:Point noted, but without the two quotations, the identical wording in the two articles is reduced to 38%, much of which relates to job titles, which cannot be written differently. [[User:Daemonickangaroo2018|Daemonickangaroo2018]] ([[User talk:Daemonickangaroo2018#top|talk]]) 14:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC) |
:Point noted, but without the two quotations, the identical wording in the two articles is reduced to 38%, much of which relates to job titles, which cannot be written differently. [[User:Daemonickangaroo2018|Daemonickangaroo2018]] ([[User talk:Daemonickangaroo2018#top|talk]]) 14:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Edits == |
|||
Please do not revert proper edits, and furthermore please as is proper use the edit summary box to present a proper rationale for your edits. Thank you. --[[Special:Contributions/2604:2000:E010:1100:3CD3:9AC3:AED2:9C02|2604:2000:E010:1100:3CD3:9AC3:AED2:9C02]] ([[User talk:2604:2000:E010:1100:3CD3:9AC3:AED2:9C02|talk]]) 00:47, 11 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:47, 11 September 2020
Reply
Again, another misunderstanding caused by the ever-worrying mind of yours truly, OF COURSE we were, are and will be on good terms!
Take care, best wishes back --Quite A Character (talk) 22:39, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
"Bagush" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bagush. Since you had some involvement with the Bagush redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 22:06, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Hey there, I noticed that you undid my removal of Category:Indian Super League managers. The reason I removed it was because of a discussion at categories for discussion, where it was decided that the category was a duplicate of Category:Indian Super League head coaches, and should therefore have its members merged into that category. The manager category is still retained as a redirect, but should be left empty (which you can see if you look at the category page). I'm going to revert your change, but I wanted to let you know the reason why. bibliomaniac15 17:54, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
An interesting read, thank you. I ticked this at NPP, but I do note that paraphrasing of [1] is a bit close. Some of it is quotes, but some of the text could be paraphrased to a greater distance.--Eostrix (talk) 07:54, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Point noted, but without the two quotations, the identical wording in the two articles is reduced to 38%, much of which relates to job titles, which cannot be written differently. Daemonickangaroo2018 (talk) 14:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Edits
Please do not revert proper edits, and furthermore please as is proper use the edit summary box to present a proper rationale for your edits. Thank you. --2604:2000:E010:1100:3CD3:9AC3:AED2:9C02 (talk) 00:47, 11 September 2020 (UTC)