User talk:94.234.33.218: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:10, 28 September 2020

Neat! Yeah I dunno why he's gatekeeping the list of nicknames like this. He stopped responding on the talk and then I added it again and then he decided to show back up. It's a little funny actually.

Stockholm article

Hello! Someone using this IP made a change to the article while the item is being discussed on the talk page. We do not do that. Best wishes, --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Since someone using this IP has continued inappropriate editing (see previous section here) you are warned that it is likely you will be blocked if it continues. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:54, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eh? No I won't be blocked because you yourself aren't even using the talk page and I added it properly sourced. You went on som tangent about English advertising?

Warning - you added that homosexual pejorative again without consensus on the talk page. We talk first, then change if consensus is reached. You also added an irrelevant source where that word is not mentioned. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 10:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stockholm

Your recent editing history at Stockholm shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

This is a content dispute - please take to the article talk page to discuss. Giant Snowman 10:33, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+Neat! Yeah I dunno why he's gatekeeping the list of nicknames like this. He stopped responding on the talk and then I added it again and then he decided to show back up. It's a little funny actually.
 ==[[Stockholm]] article==
 Hello! Someone using this IP made a change to the article while the item is being discussed on the talk page. We do not do that. Best wishes, --[[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 17:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)