User talk:Dylsss

Welcome!

Hello, Dylsss, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Samsung Galaxy M30. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! – voidxor 19:55, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote

Dear Dylsss,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 05:09, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Announcing WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Dear Wikipedians and contributors, the open source Wikipedia review tool, previously "WikiLoop Battlefield" has completed its name vote and is announcing its new name: WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Read the full story on the program page on Meta-wiki, learn about ways to support this tool, and find out what future developments are coming for this tool.

Thank you to everyone who took part in the vote!

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 18:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Hi Dylsss,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

August 2020

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Tijuana. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Caius G. (talk) 20:00, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

@Caius G.: Hello, it seems you have misinterpreted the edit, I reverted vandalism by 117.197.62.0. You reverted my edit reintroducing the vandalism, I am not the vandal. Thanks. Dylsss (talk) 20:09, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

-- @Dylsss: My apologies! It appeared to me as if you were the one adding the supposed founder. I'll revert my own edit. Sorry again! Caius G. (talk) 20:12, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Hi Dylsss

Thank you for your helpful guidance for me a newbie poster, although i am most definately not a vandal! Re Stonyhurst College I had to go back several times to incporporate the original posters comments which were factually incorrect- plus his refs were right but i did not think i would have to repeat them as you just need to link into his refs to see how his comments were misleading!I then added some more- i did say that the first letter quoted was published in the catholic herald december 2 2002 and the second one was published on the blog of Bishop Pat Buckley- just googe him to get his blog. I hope this is ok? regards Monty 330Monty330 (talk)I —Preceding undated comment added 22:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I am not sure I understand fully what you are saying. Your edits are unnecessarily long, they quote too much directly, references are inside brackets instead of inline citations, and

Stonyhurst is a very difference place today compared with 40-50 years ago. Nonetheless, in summarising a history, it is important to accept the good AND the bad, and, in particular, give a voice to abused victims who hitherto have largely been ignored or (ahem) swept under the carpet.

is definitely not neutral or appropriate for an encyclopedia. There are also not enough inline citations supporting individual statements. It also reads to me like you may be copying this from another source, rather than something you have written yourself, which is not allowed per WP:COPYPASTE. Dylsss (talk) 22:48, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Page Deletation

Hi, I created a new Wikipedia page about DonMk and I saw you requested Deletation.. I created this page as bio for my artist character. I am a musician and I was looking to make myself more easier to find as there are alot of people with "Mk" in their names.. Thanks. I hope you understand. Mohammed Ishaku (talk) 23:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

@Mohammed Ishaku: Hello, using your user page as a way to promote yourself, and for content not related to Wikipedia's goals, is not acceptable per WP:G11 and WP:U5. Dylsss (talk) 23:16, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Oh sorry. I had no idea. Thanks for clearing that up. Mohammed Ishaku (talk) 23:45, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Bar Fruit (talk) 21:10, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Dylsss, I have already submitted the link to the FL DBPR (Florida Department of Business Professional Regulations), and have uploaded documents from this government-run licensing agency with regards to confirmed thoroughbred deaths. I receive these notifications via public records requests. It is unclear to me why you are suppressing the truth, but indeed you are. I have submitted multiple examples to Wikipedia of the results of such public records requests, but you are classifying this as “disruptive”. Your deleting them is not only egregiously inappropriate, but counter to what’s Wikipedia stands for- which is disseminating the truth from all perspectives. Are you truly impartial? Kindly leave my edits. Else, Wikipedia’s Gulfstream Park page is just a free advertisement for the racing industry. Thank you.

@Bar Fruit: Thank you for contacting me via my talk page. Personally, I think horse racing is a cruel industry, which results in unnecessary horse deaths. However, there are multiple issues with your edits, which is why they have been reverted by me and other Wikipedians multiple times. Firstly

Gulfstream Park regularly edits the replays of horses with catastrophic breakdowns. Below is a small sample of this activity: AUGER collapsed 7.8.29 FULL: https://vimeo.com/436599337 EDITED: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlzLtXAqJvc RUN DEVIL “awkward step” 8.20.20 FULL https://vimeo.com/449856744 EDITED https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFeDtDhO0bo ALLURSTRA 8.28.20 Breaks a front leg FULL: https://vimeo.com/452689543 EDITED: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpzxlrIdeq8 CHANNELED’S ANGEL 8.30.20 Breaks a front leg FULL: https://vimeo.com/453111300 EDITED: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VYWdRvjdT0.

Is inappropriate because it violates WP:OR, it has not been cited from any reliable source, it is not encyclopedic, and is your own commentary, Wikipedia does not conduct original research. Secondly

Racetracks have 18 hours to file death confirmations with the FL DBPR of horses killed or found dead on the racetrack. Horses that end up in kill pens to be purchased by kill buyers are not kept track of. There is no legal obligation to report on these horses’ whereabouts, and commonly horses end up on cattle cars on a train, destined for slaughterhouses in Mexico and Canada. While not illegal to slaughter a horse for human consumption in the US, the USDA has defunded inspecting the meat. This is why the death toll will always be higher than what is reported by the racetrack.

is not relevant to the article, nor is it backed up with any sort of citation, also not appropriate for Wikipedia.

2019: 58 deaths of thoroughbred horses on this racetrack, as confirmed by the FL DBPR (Florida Department of Business Professional Regulations) pari-mutuel wagering division via public records requests. Http://www.myflorida.com/DBPR/

is uncited, and constitutes WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH, since in your above reply, you state yourself that

I receive these notifications via public records requests

it appears that the death amount is your own research, and you have not cited any source, http://www.myflorida.com/DBPR/ is a dead link for me, and does not link to the amount of horse deaths at this entity.

2020: Through July 30th there are 35 confirmed deaths of thoroughbred horses.

is also uncited. Do not add information without being able to WP:VERIFY it, whenever you make an edit to Wikipedia, it is expected that the statement is verifiable, if it is not, you should expect it to be reverted. I've already reverted 4 times, constituting an edit war, I encourage you to add references, otherwise I will revert it again in 24 hours, or another editer might revert it sooner. Addtionally refernces are not in the correct syntax, they are in plain text. Thank you. Dylsss (talk) 21:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

I have carefully reviewed the editing disputes page, your comments, and have repeatedly provided “balancing material” citations, as the Gulfstream Park page is biased. I have also edited what I provided, as I am learning the Wikipedia rules and am interested in adhering to them. Further, I have not deleted a single item from the page. I am being respectful to both you and the site. My material is from the government run licensing agency that keeps track of thoroughbred race horses euthanized on racetracks. The material I have provided is in succinct fashion, and can be fact checked. How are these confirmed deaths that have occurred at Gulfstream Park as a direct result of horse racing, not relevant to the page? If this isn’t “balancing material”, then please explain what is.

The Public Records Act, Chapter 119.07 of the Florida Statutes entitles individuals to submit public records requests to state licensing agencies. Such requests are sent to the Florida Department of Business Professional Regulations (FL DBPR) pari-mutuel wagering division. Racehorse deaths must be reported within 18 hours to the FL DBPR according to Florida statue rule 61D-2.023(7)(c), , and in 2019 Gulfstream Park has reported 58 deaths to the FL DBPR. The public is entitled to this information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bar Fruit (talk • contribs) 18:55, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

@Bar Fruit: You have not reviewed the links to Wikipedia policies which I have given to you, so instead I will quote the important parts On Wikipedia, an inline citation refers to a citation in a page's text placed by any method that allows the reader to associate a given bit of material with specific reliable source(s) that support it. Your citation verifies that I can make a public access request, not how many horses have died at this venue, and as such, does not satisfy the verifiability policy which says In the English Wikipedia, verifiability means other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. as said in the policy All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, the burden lies with you, not me. Additionally Source material must have been published, the definition of which for our purposes is "made available to the public in some form"., the material you're adding, you claim comes from a public access request, and as such is not published or verified by an inline citation. The verifiability policy also says Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source., which is why I've removed the material, and why you should not be adding it back unless you can satisfy the Wikipedia policies verifiability and original research. Your material is original research, because as said in the policy The phrase "original research" (OR) is used on Wikipedia to refer to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist, it also says Do not add unsourced material from your personal experience, because that would make Wikipedia a primary source of that material., which is what you are doing. While what you are adding may be true, the original research policy says Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it.. You seem to be a single-purpose account focused only on adding this material, rather than contributing constructively to Wikipedia. Dylsss (talk) 20:07, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Also, this is not "balancing material", NPOV is about how we write about and summarise what reliable sources have said, but your material has no source, so NPOV doesn't apply here, and adding negative unverifiable content does not somehow make an article more neutral. Neither is your information "confirmed", it's confirmed by you, so it is primary original research. Dylsss (talk) 20:37, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Can you help me change my user name and publish my article for my new client? JabrielAtOmoMusicGroup (talk) 18:42, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

@JabrielAtOmoMusicGroup: Hello, I do not have the rights to change your username, only users in the global renamers group or stewards can change usernames on Wikimedia projects, and as said on your talk page, you do not need to change your username. While I do have the rights to move your draft to article space, it should be reviewed by an Articles for Creation reviewer, you can submit it for a review by placing {{subst:submit}} at the top of the article and clicking the "Submit your draft for review!" button, there is however currently a backlog of 3,300 articles waiting for review, so it could take up to 2 months for the draft to be reviewed. Additionally, I do not believe this person is notable enough to have a Wikipedia article per WP:MUSICBIO and WP:ARTIST. Thanks. Dylsss (talk) 20:25, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Hey! Sorry, I accidentally reverted your revert. I misread the history. Sorry about that! I originally had a notice here, but I removed it as to not cause confusion. motevets (talk) 22:58, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Jessica Harp

Hello Dylsss, I note you removed the update I made to this article yesterday; the Myspace was nothing to do with me, but given that her "official site" is now evidently defunct, and she has the link to the site I added at the top of her Twitter bio, I can't help but feel that it's more-or-less her "official site" now. Not the end of the world either way, but just thought the context might carry some value.78.144.76.44 (talk) 15:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

@78.144.76.44: Fansites and social media should generally be avoided as an external link per WP:ELNO, especially without any context, I don't think it really makes sense including it. Dylsss (talk) 18:29, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For dealing with that IP editor on British Columbia, I award you the Anti-Vandalism Barnstar! Keep up the good work. You've done a good job dealing with vandalism since you first joined. Scorpions13256 (talk) 00:05, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Anarchyte (talk • work) 06:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Edit Revert

Hey, just wanted to say sorry for reverting your edit on Hampton School. I had Twinkle on, and accidentally clicked revert without thinking. I’ve edited it back to your latest version. EdNg07 (talk) 14:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you.

Thank you Dylsss. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clancannon (talk • contribs) 19:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

@Clancannon: You're welcome, when citing a source, remember to press the cite button, not the link button (if using the visual editor), you shouldn't need to sort references, they should automatically sort numerically from when they are first used. Also remember to sign your comments by typing four tildes (~~~~) and thanks for contributing. Dylsss (talk) 21:00, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Biased views

Hi Dylsss

The amendments made by me to two of the wikipedia pages are factually and widely accepted view and therefore. The French Govt. Chevalier award is not given to any tom, dick and Harry and just becuase an actor comes from outside the Bollywood fraternity, edits which is widely accepted and does not cause harm and hurt to anyone should not be rejected. this could create an impression that the contents are controlled to promote a particular view point and you must be aware, majority of media course in the World is biased and wither support a school of thought or of a particular Government or organisation.

The edits on Jayalalitha, a popular Chief Minister of the State of Tamil Nadu in India, is all factual and can be verified from multiple sources.

Please therefore accept the edits made by me.