Jump to content

Boquila: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Steorra (talk | contribs)
Mimicry: a phenotypically change > a phenotypic change
Line 32: Line 32:
Their mimicking behavior was discovered by researchers Ernesto Gianoli and Fernando Carrasco-Urra. They carried out observations and measurements in a rainforest located at [[Puyehue National Park]] in southern [[Chile]]. They sampled 12 different species of host trees with 45 total individual ''B. trifoliolata'' vines that had climbed these trees. The two closest leaves in proximity between a pair of the 45 vine-trees were measured, 11 different traits in total: angle, thickness, petiole length, leaflet petiole length, leaflet angle, maximum width, maximum length, area, perimeter, area/perimeter, and color. Usage of a [[generalized linear model]] showed that 9 of the 11 traits demonstrated mimicry by the vine to its host tree. Gianoli et al. also sampled more individuals that were prostrated, that grew on leafless tree trunks, and more individuals that have climbed on the 8 most common host species. To analyze these samples, the researchers used [[multivariate analysis of variance]] (MANOVA). They found that the prostrate individuals were not different from the leafless-host vines, but that they were different for 7 of the 8 common-host vine leaves. They also concluded that the leafless-host vines were different for 6 of the 8 common-host vines.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Gianoli|first=Ernesto|last2=Carrasco-Urra|first2=Fernando |journal=Current Biology |volume=24 |issue=9 |pages=P984-987|title=Leaf Mimicry in a Climbing Plant Protects against Herbivory |url=https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(14)00269-3 |doi=10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.010|doi-access=free }}</ref>
Their mimicking behavior was discovered by researchers Ernesto Gianoli and Fernando Carrasco-Urra. They carried out observations and measurements in a rainforest located at [[Puyehue National Park]] in southern [[Chile]]. They sampled 12 different species of host trees with 45 total individual ''B. trifoliolata'' vines that had climbed these trees. The two closest leaves in proximity between a pair of the 45 vine-trees were measured, 11 different traits in total: angle, thickness, petiole length, leaflet petiole length, leaflet angle, maximum width, maximum length, area, perimeter, area/perimeter, and color. Usage of a [[generalized linear model]] showed that 9 of the 11 traits demonstrated mimicry by the vine to its host tree. Gianoli et al. also sampled more individuals that were prostrated, that grew on leafless tree trunks, and more individuals that have climbed on the 8 most common host species. To analyze these samples, the researchers used [[multivariate analysis of variance]] (MANOVA). They found that the prostrate individuals were not different from the leafless-host vines, but that they were different for 7 of the 8 common-host vine leaves. They also concluded that the leafless-host vines were different for 6 of the 8 common-host vines.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Gianoli|first=Ernesto|last2=Carrasco-Urra|first2=Fernando |journal=Current Biology |volume=24 |issue=9 |pages=P984-987|title=Leaf Mimicry in a Climbing Plant Protects against Herbivory |url=https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(14)00269-3 |doi=10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.010|doi-access=free }}</ref>


Currently, there is no known mechanism for how ''B. trifoliolata'' is able to mimic host leaves so well, but Gianoli proposes two possible mechanisms. One hypothesis is that [[volatile organic compounds]] emitted from host plant leaves induce a phenotypically change in closeby ''B. trifoliolata'' leaves. By receiving different host signals into its system, it is able to create specific signals and hormones in its tissues to regulate gene transcription of leaf morphology and developmental pathways for leaf differentiation.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Bar|first=Maya|last2=Ori|first2=Naomi|date=2014-11-15|title=Leaf development and morphogenesis|journal=Development|language=en|volume=141|issue=22|pages=4219–4230|doi=10.1242/dev.106195|issn=0950-1991|pmid=25371359|doi-access=free}}</ref> The other hypothesis is that there could be [[horizontal gene transfer]] between the host and ''B. trifoliolata''. A study also by Gianoli et al. indicated that this leaf mimicry led to lower leaf herbivory rates. Climbing vines had no difference in herbivory compared to supporting host tree leaves but had much lower herbivory compared to prostrated, unsupported ''B. trifoliolata'' individuals. The highest amount of herbivory was on ''B. trifoliolata'' vines that climbed onto leafless hosts.<ref name=":0">{{cite journal |author1=Gianoli, E. |author2=Carrasco-Urra, F. |title=Leaf Mimicry in a Climbing Plant Protects against Herbivory |journal=Current Biology |volume=24 |issue=9 |pages=984–987 |url=http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(14)00269-3 |doi=10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.010 |pmid=24768053|year=2014 |doi-access=free }}</ref>
Currently, there is no known mechanism for how ''B. trifoliolata'' is able to mimic host leaves so well, but Gianoli proposes two possible mechanisms. One hypothesis is that [[volatile organic compounds]] emitted from host plant leaves induce a phenotypic change in closeby ''B. trifoliolata'' leaves. By receiving different host signals into its system, it is able to create specific signals and hormones in its tissues to regulate gene transcription of leaf morphology and developmental pathways for leaf differentiation.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Bar|first=Maya|last2=Ori|first2=Naomi|date=2014-11-15|title=Leaf development and morphogenesis|journal=Development|language=en|volume=141|issue=22|pages=4219–4230|doi=10.1242/dev.106195|issn=0950-1991|pmid=25371359|doi-access=free}}</ref> The other hypothesis is that there could be [[horizontal gene transfer]] between the host and ''B. trifoliolata''. A study also by Gianoli et al. indicated that this leaf mimicry led to lower leaf herbivory rates. Climbing vines had no difference in herbivory compared to supporting host tree leaves but had much lower herbivory compared to prostrated, unsupported ''B. trifoliolata'' individuals. The highest amount of herbivory was on ''B. trifoliolata'' vines that climbed onto leafless hosts.<ref name=":0">{{cite journal |author1=Gianoli, E. |author2=Carrasco-Urra, F. |title=Leaf Mimicry in a Climbing Plant Protects against Herbivory |journal=Current Biology |volume=24 |issue=9 |pages=984–987 |url=http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(14)00269-3 |doi=10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.010 |pmid=24768053|year=2014 |doi-access=free }}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 16:53, 20 October 2020

Boquila
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Clade: Eudicots
Order: Ranunculales
Family: Lardizabalaceae
Genus: Boquila
Decne.
Species:
B. trifoliolata
Binomial name
Boquila trifoliolata
Synonyms[1]
  • Boquila discolor (Kunze ex Poepp. & Endl.) Decne.
  • Dolichos funarius Molina
  • Lardizabala funaria (Molina) Looser
  • Lardizabala trifoliolata DC.

Boquila is a monotypic genus of flowering plants in the family Lardizabalaceae,[2] native to temperate forests of central and southern Chile and Argentina. The sole species is Boquila trifoliolata (DC.) Decne., known as pilpil, voqui, voquicillo, voquillo, voqui blanco in Chile. It grows vines that wrap around host plants, mimicking the host’s leaves in a phenomenon called mimetic polymorphism.[3] It bears an edible fruit (Boquila berries).

This species has been shown to be capable of mimicking the leaves of its supporting trees.[4]

Ernesto Gianoli said "Boquila’s leaves are extraordinarily diverse. The biggest ones can be 10 times bigger than the smallest, and they can vary from very light to very dark. In around three-quarters of cases, they’re similar to the closest leaf from another tree, matching it in size, area, length of stalk, angle, and color. Boquila’s leaves can even grow a spiny tip when, and only when, it climbs onto a shrub with spine-tipped leaves."[5] Without any nearby host leaves to influence them, the normal leaves of the B. Trifoliolata are relatively short and light green leaves with rounded edges.[6]

The Boquila, unlike other plants capable of mimicry, does not require physical contact to match its host.[7]

Mimicry

Boquila trifoliolata is a unique species of plant because of its ability to mimic its leaves to the leaves of the hosts that are supporting them, a phenomenon called mimetic polymorphism.[8] The B. trifoliolata adapted their climbing behavior to be protected from ground herbivores and the mimicry behavior as a protection against leaf herbivores.[4] B. trifoliolata is distinct in comparison to other plants that can mimic, like the Australian Mistletoe, because it is not limited to mimicking a single host and also is not a parasite to the host tree. An individual B. trifoliolata vine can mimic multiple foliage closest in proximity to it.[9]

Their mimicking behavior was discovered by researchers Ernesto Gianoli and Fernando Carrasco-Urra. They carried out observations and measurements in a rainforest located at Puyehue National Park in southern Chile. They sampled 12 different species of host trees with 45 total individual B. trifoliolata vines that had climbed these trees. The two closest leaves in proximity between a pair of the 45 vine-trees were measured, 11 different traits in total: angle, thickness, petiole length, leaflet petiole length, leaflet angle, maximum width, maximum length, area, perimeter, area/perimeter, and color. Usage of a generalized linear model showed that 9 of the 11 traits demonstrated mimicry by the vine to its host tree. Gianoli et al. also sampled more individuals that were prostrated, that grew on leafless tree trunks, and more individuals that have climbed on the 8 most common host species. To analyze these samples, the researchers used multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). They found that the prostrate individuals were not different from the leafless-host vines, but that they were different for 7 of the 8 common-host vine leaves. They also concluded that the leafless-host vines were different for 6 of the 8 common-host vines.[10]

Currently, there is no known mechanism for how B. trifoliolata is able to mimic host leaves so well, but Gianoli proposes two possible mechanisms. One hypothesis is that volatile organic compounds emitted from host plant leaves induce a phenotypic change in closeby B. trifoliolata leaves. By receiving different host signals into its system, it is able to create specific signals and hormones in its tissues to regulate gene transcription of leaf morphology and developmental pathways for leaf differentiation.[11] The other hypothesis is that there could be horizontal gene transfer between the host and B. trifoliolata. A study also by Gianoli et al. indicated that this leaf mimicry led to lower leaf herbivory rates. Climbing vines had no difference in herbivory compared to supporting host tree leaves but had much lower herbivory compared to prostrated, unsupported B. trifoliolata individuals. The highest amount of herbivory was on B. trifoliolata vines that climbed onto leafless hosts.[4]

See also

  • Lardizabala, a related species also grown for its fruit

References

  1. ^ "The Plant List: A Working List of All Plant Species". Retrieved June 19, 2014.
  2. ^ SB Hoot, A Culham, PR Crane, 1995. The utility of atpB gene sequences in resolving phylogenetic relationships: comparison with rbcL and 18S ribosomal DNA sequences in the Lardizabalaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 194-207
  3. ^ "ScienceShot: 'Chameleon' Vine Discovered in Chile". Science | AAAS. 2014-04-24. Retrieved 2018-06-02.
  4. ^ a b c Gianoli, E.; Carrasco-Urra, F. (2014). "Leaf Mimicry in a Climbing Plant Protects against Herbivory". Current Biology. 24 (9): 984–987. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.010. PMID 24768053.
  5. ^ Ed Yong (24 April 2014). "The Most Versatile Impressionist In the Forest". National Geographic. Archived from the original on 2017-08-23. Retrieved 21 February 2016.
  6. ^ "The Sneaky Life of the World's Most Mysterious Plant". Phenomena. 2016-02-19. Archived from the original on 2017-07-01. Retrieved 2018-06-02.
  7. ^ Ed Yong (24 April 2014). "The Most Versatile Impressionist In the Forest". National Geographic. Archived from the original on 2017-08-23. Retrieved 21 March 2017.
  8. ^ Yirka, Bob (2014-04-28). "Researchers Discover Vine that is Able to Mimic Multiple Hosts". Retrieved 2020-01-19.
  9. ^ Pannell, John R. (2014). "Leaf Mimicry: Chameleon-like Leaves in a Patagonian Vine". Current Biology. 24 (9): R357–R359. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.066.
  10. ^ Gianoli, Ernesto; Carrasco-Urra, Fernando. "Leaf Mimicry in a Climbing Plant Protects against Herbivory". Current Biology. 24 (9): P984-987. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.010.
  11. ^ Bar, Maya; Ori, Naomi (2014-11-15). "Leaf development and morphogenesis". Development. 141 (22): 4219–4230. doi:10.1242/dev.106195. ISSN 0950-1991. PMID 25371359.