Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amelia Presley: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Dating comment by RedDirtRedBird - "→Amelia Presley: " |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Do Not Delete''' does not meet criteria for speedy deletion. Plenty of sources cited. It definitely needs cleanup though.[[User:almaniacopedia| almaniacopedia]] ([[User talk: almaniacopedia|talk]]) 11:20, 23 October 2020 (UTC) |
*'''Do Not Delete''' does not meet criteria for speedy deletion. Plenty of sources cited. It definitely needs cleanup though.[[User:almaniacopedia| almaniacopedia]] ([[User talk: almaniacopedia|talk]]) 11:20, 23 October 2020 (UTC) |
||
*'''Very weak keep'''. The article seems to have sources that don't belong, such a Itunes, but she does have a history, and a couple of other verifiable sources. The majority does seem to be original research, however. [[User:Le Panini|<span style="color:#F40">Le Panini</span>]] [[User talk:Le Panini|''<small>(<sup>Talk to</sup><sub>me?</sub>)</small>'']] 17:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC) |
*'''Very weak keep'''. The article seems to have sources that don't belong, such a Itunes, but she does have a history, and a couple of other verifiable sources. The majority does seem to be original research, however. [[User:Le Panini|<span style="color:#F40">Le Panini</span>]] [[User talk:Le Panini|''<small>(<sup>Talk to</sup><sub>me?</sub>)</small>'']] 17:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC) |
||
*'''Needs Work But Should Be Kept'''. Agree with [[User:Le Panini| |
*'''Needs Work But Should Be Kept'''. Agree with [[User:Le Panini|LePanini]] & [[User:almaniacopedia| almaniacopedia]]... I think that the sources need cleaning up. But I do not think article should be deleted. [[user:RedDirtRedBird| RedDirtRedBird]] ([[User Talk: RedDirtRedBird|talk]]) |
Revision as of 17:28, 23 October 2020
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Amelia Presley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:BAND. Failure to launch scenario. scope_creepTalk 09:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: no evidence of notability per WP:MUSICBIO. The only conceivable alternative to deletion would be a redirect to Highway Sisters, but I've just taken a look at the band's page and nominated it for deletion. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 11:48, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet our inclusion guidelines for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Do Not Delete does not meet criteria for speedy deletion. Plenty of sources cited. It definitely needs cleanup though. almaniacopedia (talk) 11:20, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Very weak keep. The article seems to have sources that don't belong, such a Itunes, but she does have a history, and a couple of other verifiable sources. The majority does seem to be original research, however. Le Panini (Talk tome?) 17:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Needs Work But Should Be Kept. Agree with LePanini & almaniacopedia... I think that the sources need cleaning up. But I do not think article should be deleted. RedDirtRedBird (talk)