User talk:Wikieditor1377: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:57, 31 October 2020

September 2020

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Martian (film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SummerPhD^v2.0 02:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikieditor1377, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Wikieditor1377! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Raw foodism. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You appear to be soapboxing (WP:SOAP) and edit warring (WP:WAR) to establish your own opinion, without citing reliable scientific sources or gaining consensus on the talk page - see WP:CON. Raw foodism is related to diet and nutrition, so is a topic bordering on human health, which requires the strongest possible medical references, WP:MEDRS. Zefr (talk) 15:22, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I basically used harvard food source link backed by numerous book references within, other reference was from oxford university. That is definitely a reliable scientific source, much more reliable actually than most of the ones currently being used on that page. Wikieditor1377 (talk) 15:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 15:41, 31 October 2020 edit Wikieditor1377 (talk \| contribs) 64 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:57, 31 October 2020 edit undo Wikieditor1377 (talk \| contribs) 64 edits mNo edit summary Next edit →
Line 30:		Line 30:
	Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:List of policies\|policies and guidelines]], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|loss of editing privileges]]. ''You appear to be soapboxing ([[WP:SOAP]]) and edit warring ([[WP:WAR]]) to establish your own opinion, without citing reliable scientific sources or gaining consensus on the talk page - see [[WP:CON]]. Raw foodism is related to diet and nutrition, so is a topic bordering on human health, which requires the strongest possible medical references, [[WP:MEDRS]].''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> [[User:Zefr\|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr\|talk]]) 15:22, 31 October 2020 (UTC)		Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:List of policies\|policies and guidelines]], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|loss of editing privileges]]. ''You appear to be soapboxing ([[WP:SOAP]]) and edit warring ([[WP:WAR]]) to establish your own opinion, without citing reliable scientific sources or gaining consensus on the talk page - see [[WP:CON]]. Raw foodism is related to diet and nutrition, so is a topic bordering on human health, which requires the strongest possible medical references, [[WP:MEDRS]].''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> [[User:Zefr\|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr\|talk]]) 15:22, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

	:Thanks. I basically used ~~the own~~ harvard food source link backed by numerous book references within, other reference was from oxford university. That is definitely a reliable scientific source, much more reliable actually than most of the ones currently being used on that page. [[User:Wikieditor1377\|Wikieditor1377]] ([[User talk:Wikieditor1377#top\|talk]]) 15:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC)		:Thanks. I basically used harvard food source link backed by numerous book references within, other reference was from oxford university. That is definitely a reliable scientific source, much more reliable actually than most of the ones currently being used on that page. [[User:Wikieditor1377\|Wikieditor1377]] ([[User talk:Wikieditor1377#top\|talk]]) 15:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC)