Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ineedtostopforgetting: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 987229942 by Nthep (talk)
Line 39: Line 39:
* I found another account, {{checkuser|Fetboten}}, another glaringly obvious account. Appears to be a [[WP:SPA]]. Worth a CheckUsre Investigation. [[Special:Contributions/73.33.152.17|73.33.152.17]] ([[User talk:73.33.152.17|talk]]) 19:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
* I found another account, {{checkuser|Fetboten}}, another glaringly obvious account. Appears to be a [[WP:SPA]]. Worth a CheckUsre Investigation. [[Special:Contributions/73.33.152.17|73.33.152.17]] ([[User talk:73.33.152.17|talk]]) 19:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
I've blocked some confirmed socks:

*{{checkuser|GreenlawnNewYorker}}
*{{checkuser|Naisemaey}}
*{{checkuser|Leoghen}}
*{{checkuser|Fetboten}}
*{{checkuser|SungKR}}
*{{checkuser|JohnsonBirdman}}
Telsho was previously checked, and recorded as likely. I would say it's a bit more than likely. The other accounts, without more information, I'm going to defer to others. No comment on the IPs. -- [[user:zzuuzz|zzuuzz]] <sup>[[user_talk:zzuuzz|(talk)]]</sup> 22:07, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->



===5 November 2020===
===5 November 2020===

Revision as of 22:08, 5 November 2020

Ineedtostopforgetting

Ineedtostopforgetting (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:


29 October 2020

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

Already identified and blocked socks
  • Fits the pattern, also more personal attacks on talk pages (its the same thing as last time copy pasted) which probably need admin attention. It should be obvious in hindsight that Telsho was an Ineedtostopforgetting sock given the barrage of punishment that was launched after that account’s indef. Can we get them officially added to the list of socks? Huaxia, DemisJohnson, and Honoredebalzac345 are dormant accounts which in hindsight fit the profile and should be checked out, Ineedtostopforgetting has a long history of letting accounts go dormant before using them again. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:45, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Added JohnsonBirdman, they hit the golden pair of Milk Tea and Singapore (specifically the traditional Singapore human rights whitewash and the removal of Taiwan from milk tea which are both long-standing projects of this socker) and overall fit the pattern. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:25, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

183.90.37.65 seems to have picked up where 183.90.36.39 left off. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:54, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

I've blocked some confirmed socks:

Telsho was previously checked, and recorded as likely. I would say it's a bit more than likely. The other accounts, without more information, I'm going to defer to others. No comment on the IPs. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:07, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


5 November 2020

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

  • To be fair its hard to tell a Ineedtostopforgetting sock from your garden variety Singapore booster but I think this one needs a look, they keep popping up and supporting Ineedtostopforgetting socks even if unintentionally. Their style of interaction and writing also match that of Ineedtostopforgetting. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:46, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Katherine2005:, if you’re not a sock I apologize entirely. Please understand that this sockmaster has been incredibly destructive to Wikipedia and that the check process is a necessary one which does not reflect negatively on you if no connection is found. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:58, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments