Jump to content

Talk:Hindu–Arabic numeral system: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Hindu–Arabic numeral system/Archive 2) (bot
Tag: Reverted
Line 17: Line 17:
}}
}}
{{archive box | auto=yes }}
{{archive box | auto=yes }}

== Glyph comparison ==

It's misleading to include the "Modern Greek" (A', B', etc.) and Hebrew symbols, and possibly the Chinese, for two reasons. As the article says, "The glyphs in actual use are descended from Brahmi numerals and have split into various typographical variants since the Middle Ages", but this is not true of the Greek and Hebrew symbols, nor of the Chinese. The Greek and Hebrew are also not part of the system described in the article, with positional notation values (and I don't know whather the Chinese does or doesn't).--[[User:Linguistatlunch|Linguistatlunch]] ([[User talk:Linguistatlunch|talk]]) 16:58, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:58, 13 November 2020

Glyph comparison

It's misleading to include the "Modern Greek" (A', B', etc.) and Hebrew symbols, and possibly the Chinese, for two reasons. As the article says, "The glyphs in actual use are descended from Brahmi numerals and have split into various typographical variants since the Middle Ages", but this is not true of the Greek and Hebrew symbols, nor of the Chinese. The Greek and Hebrew are also not part of the system described in the article, with positional notation values (and I don't know whather the Chinese does or doesn't).--Linguistatlunch (talk) 16:58, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]