User talk:New Rock Star: Difference between revisions
Kishanjoshi (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 262: | Line 262: | ||
== WikiProject Trivium == |
== WikiProject Trivium == |
||
You have been invited to join the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Trivium|WikiProject Trivium]] [[User:Asics|Asics]] 16:24, 6 January 2007 (UTC) |
You have been invited to join the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Trivium|WikiProject Trivium]] [[User:Asics|Asics]] 16:24, 6 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
Please stop. Please stick with historical facts rather than publishing the views of barbarians and fascists masquerading as history. Please be professional, polite and non-hysterical.Or else, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] for disruption. Stick to the objective facts and not personal spin and calculated distortion of facts. Thank you. <!-- Template:Npa3 --> --[[User:Sigma 7|Sigma 7]] 03:11, 7 January 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:39, 7 January 2007
Thanks
for your birthday greeting. Unfortunately I don't "rock" too much! I only listen to occasional rock/metal songs though I don't mind classical rock too much. Cheers GizzaChat © 07:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Hey
I'm sorry - for everything. I think it's best not to go into much more detail than that. I was wrong about it all. Except Metalocalypse - It still ROCKS. And I really did think you looked like a cool person.NinaEliza 05:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Did you know?
--GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 15:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 11th.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 50 | 11 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
DYK
--Yomanganitalk 01:23, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- That was a great effort by you. Congrats on the DYk, I myself have read some books from the Jagadguru .Bakaman 05:53, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 18th.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 51 | 18 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:18, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I came to u through Satavahanas page. I had also seen u on Shivaji page. satvahanas had Marathi as their court-language and not Maharashtri-Prakrit. Also I request u to have a look on Yadavas of Deogiri page. 04:25, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- I have been blocked and slapped with false allegations of being sock and abusive etc. I have a book of Mr.Kolarkar (Marathyancha itihaas) where their not a single mention of Yadavas of Deogiri being Kannadiga or court language being kannada yet Mr.Kannambadi has added some stuff which are not related to 'Yadavas of Deogiri'. He says about 500 inscriptions are found in karnataka (of Yadavas) and now he's saying that some other user might have added it and those inscriptions prove that kannada was a court-language of Yadavas. The same user tend to hide Maratha-origin theory as well on rashtrakutas.
- I request u to verify Yadavas article closely. Itihaas 11:02, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 26th.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 52 | 26 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:22, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Request
I request u to revert the removal my valid edits at Seuna_yadavas_of_devagiri since Google books are allowed as citations on wikipedia. A certain user is insulting Marathi history and pushing kannada stuff in our articles.Plz find the details on talk page and history.
- Plz do so. whatever i have done on yadavs page was according to wikipedia rules and norms. Yet the article isnt available for edition for me. Mr.Kannambadi with his Marathi-hatred has jeopardized the article. I have worked very hard to get the books and sources. Vishu123 06:54, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
I am waiting for ur help. Dont we have more Marathi guys here who are intrested in history? Few editors are deliberately destroying Marathi history artciles and inserting their language nonsense. yadavas the pure Marathi empire is one of them. On top of it my cited info is shamelessly removed. Its like 'aaple te baal dusryache te karta'.Vishu123 19:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
see this where Mr.Kannambadi shamelessly insults yadavas and if any sane person reads it will understand that here Kannambadi is agreeing that yadavas were Marathis and suddenly he gets down and adds kannada nonsense their.Vishu123 19:23, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 2nd, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 1 | 2 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
It is pity that it is only me who's fighting against Mr.Kannambadi's insult of Maharashtra history. As a Marathi person u should had supported me against him especially when i am talking sense and true. Arent Yadavas of Devagiri our ancestors? If they are kannadiga so are you and me. After spending horus in library looking for books and spending fee hundred rupees all what i have got is insults and ill-comments from Mr.kannambadi and his allias. Still none of Marathi editors are aware of dubious partisan and one-sided books of Mr.Kannambadi. Why is he pampared even if he has a deep hatred against Maharashtrians and he himself has agreed that Yadavas are marathi also see this this. In the Ganagas page he is removing the Shravanbelagola Marathi inscription by giving hillarious explaination of it is already on other page? So why should be on this relevant page? He deleted everything i added in rashtrakutas chalukyas yadavas by imagining that Google books and marathi books are not allowed. I even presented the links to prove that they are allowed and result is i am blocked! Still no one is taking note of his blatant kannada terrorism across the history articles of wikipedia. For instance go to any page made by him and serach for word 'kannada.
I am almost thrown out out of all articles by various blocks, silence of marathi editors and inaction by concerned seniors. I have done my duty of trying my best. I have not taken the 'theka' of defending these articles. It is getting on my nerves. I am going to throw my books to kabadi because of these kannambadis in wikipedia. rememebr it is our ignorance which is enabling such kannambadis to ruin our articles. 59.95.39.200 07:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC) PS-Neither i am mahwiki or sarvabhaum. i dont know why u ppl slap me with these allegations? 59.95.39.200 07:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Hinduism-related Collaboration of the week
You have been invited to help improve the article Sita Ram Goel in this weeks's Hinduism collaboration. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. See also these related articles. [1]
You can also vote for next's week collaboration at the project page: Wikipedia:Hinduism-related Collaboration of the week. Unfortunately, the Collaboration site is little known, that's why the reminder. --Bondego 14:36, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Trivium
You have been invited to join the WikiProject Trivium Asics 16:24, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. Please stick with historical facts rather than publishing the views of barbarians and fascists masquerading as history. Please be professional, polite and non-hysterical.Or else, you will be blocked for disruption. Stick to the objective facts and not personal spin and calculated distortion of facts. Thank you. --Sigma 7 03:11, 7 January 2007 (UTC)