Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voter Integrity Fund

Voter Integrity Fund

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Voter Integrity Fund (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a grouping of various pro-Trump individuals who came together after Joe Biden won the 2020 election and who are trying to substantiate Trump's baseless election fraud claims. The group has no notability aside from being covered in relation to this one event in the last two weeks. The long-term relevance of the group is unclear. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 05:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

• Keep Trump's claims are not baseless if there actually is fraud. This group includes notable people and is providing some of the evidence everyone has been requesting related to lawsuits the Trump team has/will be filing, including numerous instances of absentee ballots not requested and absentee ballots not recorded after return, plus affidavits from defrauded voters. The group is also reporting numerous absentee ballots requested through illegal post office box and commercial addresses and instances of voting in two states. Braynard says in his report that it's informing the lawsuits that are being filed this week, and the scope of the investigation is something of a landmark, regardless of the lawsuits' success. (See video report and upcoming white paper.) Information on the organization, its operation and its goals is from several highly reliable mainstream sources. Pkeets (talk) 05:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. We don't publish Wikipedia articles about things we think may become notable, and the coverage in RS is far insufficient at the current moment. As for the comment that Trump's claims are not baseless if there actually is fraud, my claims that there are little green men piloting a very convincing Trump mech-suit are not baseless if that's actually the case, but we certainly don't write articles about it, even if I promise to provide proof of the claim at some later date. GorillaWarfare (talk) 05:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete for now - at the moment the sourcing is inadequate for this group. PhilKnight (talk) 15:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
• Comment - In nominating articles for deletion, WP:NPOV guidelines should control. The political opinions and assertions of individual users is moot and irrelevant when it comes to determining whether an article satisfies Wikipedia guidelines or not. That said, it seems questionable to me whether this article currently meets WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:NTEMP. aNubiSIII ^{(T / C)} 16:20, 25 November 2020 (UTC)