User talk:Supreme Deliciousness: Difference between revisions
→November 2020: Replying to Supreme Deliciousness (using reply-link) |
|||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 hour''' for not assuming good faith; accusing other editors of cherrypicking, as you did at [[:Special:Diff/991162586#Proposed edit nov28]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. [[User:Valereee|—valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 17:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 hour''' for not assuming good faith; accusing other editors of cherrypicking, as you did at [[:Special:Diff/991162586#Proposed edit nov28]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. [[User:Valereee|—valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 17:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
||
:So if I point out that someone is cherry picking sources, how does that justify a block? Thats how I viewed the situation. --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness#top|talk]]) 17:32, 28 November 2020 (UTC) |
:So if I point out that someone is cherry picking sources, how does that justify a block? Thats how I viewed the situation. --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness#top|talk]]) 17:32, 28 November 2020 (UTC) |
||
::Talk about the edits, not the editor. Assume good faith. Pointing out that someone is cherrypicking sources is assuming bad faith. [[User:Valereee|—valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 17:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:38, 28 November 2020
Warring
SD, stop edit-warring at Syrian Kurdistan. The RfC moderator has urged you to accept the clean-up while discussion continues, and I urge you likewise. Enough is enough. Konli17 (talk) 16:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
You're projecting again. Konli17 (talk) 19:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GPinkerton (talk) 12:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Preferred pronouns
Hi I try to use singular they until I know someone's preference, but since you don't declare a preference on your userpage, and we are engaged in what looks like it might be a lengthy talk page discussion, I thought I should do you the courtesy of trying to find out. I am not asking you to declare your gender, which is of course absolutely none of my business, simply how you would prefer to be addressed. If you think that this question is an impertinence, please by all means revert this edit. Best GirthSummit (blether) 20:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- I'm a man.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 06:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —valereee (talk) 17:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)- So if I point out that someone is cherry picking sources, how does that justify a block? Thats how I viewed the situation. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 17:32, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- Talk about the edits, not the editor. Assume good faith. Pointing out that someone is cherrypicking sources is assuming bad faith. —valereee (talk) 17:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)