User contributions for Elielilamasabachthani
Appearance
Results for Elielilamasabachthani talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 83 edits. Account created on 26 November 2008.
29 December 2009
28 December 2009
- 17:4417:44, 28 December 2009 diff hist +38 Christmas controversies ~~~~
23 December 2009
- 18:0018:00, 23 December 2009 diff hist +126 Talk:Christmas →Is one page adequate for the subject?
- 17:5917:59, 23 December 2009 diff hist +1,709 Talk:Christmas →Is one page adequate for the subject?
17 December 2009
- 16:4616:46, 17 December 2009 diff hist −438 Christmas controversies See discussion. Rockefeller tree's official Website uses term "Christmas Tree" ~~~~
- 16:4416:44, 17 December 2009 diff hist +247 Talk:Christmas controversies →The Tree at Rockefeller Center
23 November 2009
- 13:3413:34, 23 November 2009 diff hist +1,245 Talk:Christmas →Massive Omission
16 November 2009
- 15:3415:34, 16 November 2009 diff hist +81 Christmas controversies rv How about this edit? It still contrasts the two terms without going too far. BTW, please stop the accusations. I messed up in the past, but im following the rules now. ~~~~
- 15:2815:28, 16 November 2009 diff hist +1,288 User talk:Ehrenkater →Spring Holiday: new section
13 November 2009
- 18:4318:43, 13 November 2009 diff hist +682 Talk:Christmas controversies →Wood for the Trees
- 18:3018:30, 13 November 2009 diff hist +441 Talk:Christmas controversies →POV?
- 12:5312:53, 13 November 2009 diff hist −82 Christmas controversies POV material is still POV whether or not it is in the title vs. the article. If I added a comment about the "war on secularism" people would correctly ask me to remove or qualify the statement.
- 12:3912:39, 13 November 2009 diff hist +1,389 Talk:Christmas →Massive Omission
12 November 2009
- 14:3414:34, 12 November 2009 diff hist +95 Talk:Christmas →Massive Omission
- 14:3114:31, 12 November 2009 diff hist +2,560 Talk:Christmas →Massive Omission
- 13:5213:52, 12 November 2009 diff hist −82 Christmas controversies Removed "War on Christmas". This is a POV label that assumes supporters of the term "holidays" are hostile toward Christmas or Christianity.
17 September 2009
- 11:4011:40, 17 September 2009 diff hist +937 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Elielilamasabachthani No edit summary
16 September 2009
- 05:3005:30, 16 September 2009 diff hist +13 Christmas controversies I think this is a better way to say this.
8 September 2009
- 13:5713:57, 8 September 2009 diff hist +237 Christmas controversies Added balance to the recently-changed intro to this section. Unless better evidence is presented, this should be described at best as a modest trend.
24 December 2008
- 17:0817:08, 24 December 2008 diff hist +219 Christmas controversies No edit summary
- 16:5716:57, 24 December 2008 diff hist −4 Christmas controversies No edit summary
23 December 2008
- 16:4716:47, 23 December 2008 diff hist +1,134 Christmas controversies Not POV, all claims supported by references. Stop deleting information just because you don't agree with it personally. This is supposed to be an objective record which neutrally portrays the entire s
- 13:0613:06, 23 December 2008 diff hist +1,134 Christmas controversies No edit summary
22 December 2008
- 16:1516:15, 22 December 2008 diff hist +1,215 Christmas controversies Undid revision 259530269 by CrazyInSane (talk)
18 December 2008
- 13:5513:55, 18 December 2008 diff hist +1,011 Christmas controversies No edit summary
- 13:5013:50, 18 December 2008 diff hist −571 Christmas controversies Undid revision 258778145 by Elielilamasabachthani (talk)
- 13:4313:43, 18 December 2008 diff hist +571 Christmas controversies Undid revision 258776571 by CrazyInSane (talk)
16 December 2008
- 16:0816:08, 16 December 2008 diff hist +2,295 Christmas controversies This content defines one side of the issue and should be covered in intro. Most of the content in intro is also covered elsewhere, this side of issue should be given the same space.
26 November 2008
- 14:1814:18, 26 November 2008 diff hist +783 Christmas controversies re-inserted opposing argument removed by anonymous editor.