User contributions for PerseusMeredith
A user with 138 edits. Account created on 28 September 2022.
17 November 2023
- 22:1522:15, 17 November 2023 diff hist −999 Thanksgiving (United States) →Criticism and controversy: Not a reliable source. Tag: Reverted
- 22:1222:12, 17 November 2023 diff hist −32 Thanksgiving (United States) →Criticism and controversy: None of the citations refer to genocide. That has nothing to do with Thanksgiving. Tag: Reverted
- 17:5317:53, 17 November 2023 diff hist +1,830 Talk:Megan Rapinoe Undid revision 1185427612 by Dronebogus (talk) I'm not sure why this is being taken off? Tags: Undo Reverted
9 November 2023
- 20:0320:03, 9 November 2023 diff hist −78 James Tour →Opposition to evolution and origin of life studies: The source does not say that. Also, not a reliable source.
26 October 2023
- 14:3314:33, 26 October 2023 diff hist +412 Talk:James Tour →Mainstream Approach: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:1214:12, 26 October 2023 diff hist +380 Talk:James Tour →Mainstream Approach: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:5112:51, 26 October 2023 diff hist +525 Talk:James Tour →Mainstream Approach: Reply Tag: Reply
24 October 2023
- 23:1223:12, 24 October 2023 diff hist −544 Leonard Sax →Sax's views on gender: The sentence is nonsensical and undue weight for biography of a living person.
23 October 2023
- 01:2601:26, 23 October 2023 diff hist +373 James Tour →Career: Iincluded patents, citations and h-index
19 October 2023
- 11:2711:27, 19 October 2023 diff hist +286 Talk:James Tour →Mainstream Approach: Reply Tag: Reply
- 11:2411:24, 19 October 2023 diff hist +43 User talk:Hob Gadling →James Tour
- 11:2311:23, 19 October 2023 diff hist +1,709 User talk:Hob Gadling →James Tour: new section Tag: New topic
- 10:3110:31, 19 October 2023 diff hist +744 Talk:James Tour →Mainstream Approach: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
- 09:5609:56, 19 October 2023 diff hist −13 James Tour →Opposition to evolution and origin of life studies: This is the dictionary.com definition of aniogenesis. the original evolution of life or living organisms from inorganic or inanimate substances. "to construct any convincing theory of abiogenesis, we must take into account the condition of the Earth about 4 billion years ago" Need a citation for calling abiogenesis a mainstream approach. Tags: Manual revert Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 02:3402:34, 19 October 2023 diff hist −98 James Tour →Opposition to evolution and origin of life studies: Fixed the content to be consistent with James Tour’s actual position. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
16 October 2023
- 02:3002:30, 16 October 2023 diff hist +424 Tell es-Sultan →Bronze Age: Updated with latest testing results.
13 October 2023
- 14:1814:18, 13 October 2023 diff hist −14 Alcoholics Anonymous →Effectiveness: Changed to reflect he language in the source.
- 14:1014:10, 13 October 2023 diff hist −14 Alcoholics Anonymous →Spirituality: Revised language to be consistent with the source.
10 October 2023
- 11:1411:14, 10 October 2023 diff hist +260 Talk:John Oliver →Israel monologue: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 01:1401:14, 10 October 2023 diff hist +818 John Oliver Undid revision 1179419018 by MyCatIsAChonk (talk) The article also references his opinion on the Royal Family and Boris Johnson. I'm not sure why that would get preference. This is a war not just a conflict. This monologue received major news attention from a variety of sources. Probably more than he has ever received. Tags: Undo Reverted
9 October 2023
- 17:2817:28, 9 October 2023 diff hist +836 John Oliver →Political views: Updated with monologue on views of Israel/Palestinian conflict. Tag: Reverted
7 October 2023
- 00:2600:26, 7 October 2023 diff hist −600 Abby Johnson (activist) Undue weight for a biography of a living person by one reporter in a small publication that is not a reliable source. Even if it was, it should be in the lead of her biography. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
6 October 2023
- 17:3017:30, 6 October 2023 diff hist +245 Talk:Megan Rapinoe →Why isn’t there a “criticism” section?: Reply Tags: Reverted Reply
7 September 2023
- 02:0402:04, 7 September 2023 diff hist +478 Talk:American Psychological Association →New Yorker Article: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:4701:47, 7 September 2023 diff hist +572 Talk:American Psychological Association →New Yorker Article: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:4301:43, 7 September 2023 diff hist +227 Talk:Jack Turban →Blowback against gender affirming care needs to be part of Jack Turban's wikipedia page.: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:0601:06, 7 September 2023 diff hist +471 Talk:American Psychological Association →New Yorker Article: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
6 September 2023
- 23:2523:25, 6 September 2023 diff hist +449 Talk:American Psychological Association →New Yorker Article: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 23:0723:07, 6 September 2023 diff hist +837 Talk:American Psychological Association →New Yorker Article: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 20:5720:57, 6 September 2023 diff hist +689 Talk:American Psychological Association →New Yorker Article: new section Tag: New topic
- 14:2214:22, 6 September 2023 diff hist −35 American Psychological Association Fixed typo Tag: Reverted
- 14:2014:20, 6 September 2023 diff hist +291 American Psychological Association I scaled back to remove the Study from the post. The New Yorker is a reliable source and the article is well-researched and written from a neutral point of view. I don't understand why the last entry was reverted. Tag: Reverted
- 12:3212:32, 6 September 2023 diff hist +1,307 American Psychological Association Include research published by The New Yorker Tag: Reverted
21 August 2023
- 02:4402:44, 21 August 2023 diff hist +444 Talk:Adam Schiff →Hunter Biden Emails: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:3202:32, 21 August 2023 diff hist +252 Talk:Adam Schiff →Hunter Biden Emails: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:2102:21, 21 August 2023 diff hist +497 Talk:Adam Schiff →Hunter Biden Emails: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:5601:56, 21 August 2023 diff hist +572 Talk:Adam Schiff →Hunter Biden Emails: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:3901:39, 21 August 2023 diff hist +341 Talk:Adam Schiff →Hunter Biden Emails: new section Tag: New topic
- 01:1501:15, 21 August 2023 diff hist +335 Adam Schiff Undid revision 1171328143 by Objective3000 (talk) The comment is at 5:21 in the video. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 01:1301:13, 21 August 2023 diff hist +129 User talk:Objective3000 No edit summary
20 August 2023
- 12:0112:01, 20 August 2023 diff hist +335 Adam Schiff →Comments on Trump–Russia collusion investigation: Included comments in Hunter Biden. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
7 August 2023
- 12:3112:31, 7 August 2023 diff hist +544 User talk:PerseusMeredith →August 2023: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:2712:27, 7 August 2023 diff hist +266 Talk:Megan Rapinoe →Why isn’t there a “criticism” section?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:5401:54, 7 August 2023 diff hist +9 Southern Poverty Law Center No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 01:5101:51, 7 August 2023 diff hist +231 Megan Rapinoe referenced tweet history. Tag: Reverted
1 May 2023
- 01:4601:46, 1 May 2023 diff hist +323 Noam Chomsky Wall Street Journal referenced chomsky meeting with Epstein. Tag: Reverted
28 April 2023
- 15:2515:25, 28 April 2023 diff hist +437 Clint Watts No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 15:1715:17, 28 April 2023 diff hist +379 Clint Watts Undid revision 1140532360 by Wiffer (talk) I don't understand the issue. The article cites to the Twitter article. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 13:2213:22, 28 April 2023 diff hist +445 Mary Alfred Moes Provided more detail of her vision for the Mayo Clinic
- 13:1913:19, 28 April 2023 diff hist −633 Chuck Smith (pastor) →Controversy: One anonymous source and the link doesn't show the passage. This is undue weight from an anonymous source.
