Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maritime Volunteer Service
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn with the new sources found. I think a rewrite is in order rather than deletion. (non-admin closure) Pahunkat (talk) 09:47, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Maritime Volunteer Service (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. No reliable sources which have significant coverage of the organization.
Source 1: Trivial coverage, per WP:CORPDEPTH. Simple listing "of employees, officers, directors, owners, or shareholders". Also, no inherited notability - WP:INHERITORG
Source 2, 3 and 4:From company's website.
Source 5: Trivial coverage per WP:CORPDEPTH. A "standard notice or brief announcement".
Source 6: Not a WP:RELIABLE source. Content is user-generated.
A search on Bing finds no other sources that can be used to establish notability. Pahunkat (talk) 18:00, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Pahunkat (talk) 18:00, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Comment - I’ve just found [1], however this fails sigcov and is an example of inherited notability. Pahunkat (talk) 18:18, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Keep It's a small but notable volunteer organisation, albeit the article looks like it's been written by the organisation itself. But nothing a rewrite can't fix.
A basic Google search reveals a fair amount of coverage of the organisation. - https://www.google.com/search?q=%22maritime+volunteer+service%22 I've also listed a few of the potential sources;
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-20015426 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-11233159 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/tayside_and_central/8193155.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tyne/6600685.stm https://www.yachtingmonthly.com/news/maritime-volunteers-get-royal-navy-seal-of-approval-34604 https://www.gloucestershirelive.co.uk/news/cheltenham-news/local-heroes-braving-floods-tewkesbury-2986047 https://dorsetchamber.co.uk/talbot-village-trust-is-on-board-with-maritime-volunteer-service/ https://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/anglesey-maritime-charity-made-homeless-11692768
The article needs cleaned up, or perhaps even rewritten, but I can't see the case for deleting it? Vitalis196 (talk) 00:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 17:17, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Needs cleaned up badly, most of the current content is not appropriate for Wikipedia. The references from Vitalis196 show it meets WP:GNG Jeepday (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawn with the new sources. This still needs a good clean up though. Pahunkat (talk) 09:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.