Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhondite

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rhondite

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Work of a single author. Possibly a hoax. No coverage, apart from single mention. scope_creep^Talk 21:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. – Thjarkur (talk) 22:18, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, is some kind of a trademarked steel which has two extremely minor mentions from the 90s and one report by Oak Ridge National Laboratory [1], but simply not a notable compound – Thjarkur (talk) 22:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, As per above. Setreis (talk) 16:49, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't warrant it's own article - would be a comment in another article at best. -Kj cheetham (talk) 13:53, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks notability standards Jenyire2 07:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.