Jump to content

User talk:Monkeybreath

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Monkeybreath (talk | contribs) at 21:19, 14 January 2007 (Royalguard11 Abusing His Admin Status). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Strip club

I have reported the page to WP:RPP for Full Protection. An admin will decide whether to protect it or not shortly. Diez2 02:34, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the external link, as it is a violation of of WP:EL#Links normally to be avoided #2, 3, and 10. Please do not reinsert it. You might also want to read our policy on external links. Thank you. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 04:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR vio at article Strip club

Unfortunately, your reverts on Strip club violated WP:3RR. I've reported you for so, and please do not take offense as such. You can comment under the appropriate section at the page. -Penwhale | Blast the Penwhale 08:17, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[1] made on January 9 2007 to Strip club

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 09:48, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Comment on my talk page

See WP:AN3#User:Monkeybreath_reported_by_User:Penwhale_.28Result:_24h.29. You were not the only person to violate 3RR on that incident. When it comes to 3RR, whether the intentions were good or bad, all cases are equal (exceptions are for self-reverts and simple vandalism reverts, which your case wasn't). Your comment left on my talk page is borderline violating WP:NPA. -Penwhale | Blast the Penwhale 19:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: First and second comment

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent personal attacks will not be tolerated. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 19:53, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinately as a troll sock of User:Trip_the_Light_Fantastic. From the contribs, it's obvious. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 20:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Royalguard is abusing his admin powers.

Royalguard, you truly are A FOOL! I am not a sockpuppet of Trip The Light. I just am in agreement with him that you are a NAZI and you have proven it! Don't worry, Royalguard, I'll be back under another account just as soon as my IP changes (I'm on dynamic) and I will be posting on the Admin page complaining about you how you ban people willy-nilly. You are abusing your administrative powers and should be stripped of them. You are a laughingstock, Royalguard. The world shall know it. By the way, Trip The Light ADMITTED that he was finding ways into Wikipedia after YOU banned him. If I was Trip The Light I would ADMIT IT. But I am not him. Fool! Monkeybreath 21:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Royalguard11 Abusing His Admin Status

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Monkeybreath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Royalguard11 Accusing me of being someone I'm not

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=[[Royalguard11]] Accusing me of being someone I'm not |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=[[Royalguard11]] Accusing me of being someone I'm not |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=[[Royalguard11]] Accusing me of being someone I'm not |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Royalguard11 is abusing his administrative powers! Royalguard blocked someone recently. The person who was blocked used a sockpuppet and posted on Royalguard11's talk page. I posted on Royalguard11's talk page as well and gave my support for the person Royalguard11 blocked because I felt that Royalguard was going way overboard. Now Royalguard11 has blocked me indefinitely because he thinks that I am another sockpuppet of the person he banned when I am not! Royalguard11 is abusing his admin powers by banning people with little or no reason and should be stripped of his Administrative powers. Monkeybreath 21:19, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Monkeybreath&oldid=100730161"