Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nyeema Morgan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nyeema Morgan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not yet notable artist. No work in the permanent collection of major museums. No major studies about her--the first NYT ref has one sentence mentioning her in a long review of a exhibition; the other mentions her only as the wife of the subject of the article. DGG ( talk ) 21:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Morgan has works in the permanent collections of the Bowdoin College Museum of Art and the Menil Collection and meets WP:ARTIST#4(b) with nine solo/duo exhibitions as well as residencies at Smack Mellon and the Skowhegan School of Painting and Sculpture. She also meets GNG with significant coverage in Daily Camera, BOMB magazine, and Arcade Project. This article doesn't yet include all of her exhibitions (which also have references... see Wall Street Journal, ArtForum, ArtNet). gobonobo ⁺ ^c 22:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak~~ Keep Gobonobo has summed it up well. I think It's more the collections that mean she may meet WP:NARTIST. There is not an enormous smount of coverage out there, but with the collections it maybe enough. Possibly (talk) 23:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Changing to solid keep based on the two collections and the article improvements by gobonobo. GNG is fully met, and WP:NARTIST is minimally met for the two collections (one of the works is a collaborative work, but she is clearly credited). Possibly (talk) 03:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep On the basis of available resources, subject seems to be notable. Niceguylucky (talk) 08:42, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per discussion and page improvements. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:02, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The artist is in the early stages of her career and we will probably hearing more about her in the coming years. The article in its current state, thanks to the great work by Gobonobo now meets WP:GNG. She also is in two museum collections therefore meets WP:NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 13:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Article shows signs of satisfying WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Alex-h (talk) 12:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.