Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard A. Lawrence Sr.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 09:23, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Richard A. Lawrence Sr.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mayor, councilman, and municipal judge = zero claim of notability. See WP:NPOL Rusf10 (talk) 03:45, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 03:45, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 03:45, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - FindaGrave and a genealogical website are not reliable sources, the Orlando Sentinel is a reliable source but the "article" is just a routine paragraph-entry obituary, which doesn't demonstrate notability. -Indy beetle (talk) 03:22, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Melbourne FL is not a large or important enough city to confer an automatic presumption of notability on all of its mayors under WP:NPOL just because they existed, but this is not referenced anywhere near well enough to actually pass WP:NPOL #2. Bearcat (talk) 03:50, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It doesn't meet WP:GNG as not referenced anywhere about the subject. Zackdasnicker (talk) 17:54, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.