User talk:Suryabeej

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vivek.k.Verma, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Owlf (talk) 18:10, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anurag Batra (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anurag Batra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anurag Batra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suryabeej! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anurag Batra (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheWikiholic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anurag Batra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anurag Batra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheWikiholic (talk) 14:44, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anurag Batra moved to draftspace

I have moved Anurag Batra back to draftspace. Please don't move it back yourself; note that the lack of independent sources is not the only issue. The article does not say anything about him other than the companies he owns/is the head of. bonadea contributions talk 15:21, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea: Thanks, I was myself thinking about moving it back to the draft, but the problem is I don't know as of now how to use the script and move an article to draft without leaving any redirect. apart from that I feel that this subject have indepth articles and that too more than passing GNG criteria but would you suggest me to add more info to it? have you checked the references i added, what do you feel about them, Please help!! Thank YouSuryabeej (talk) 15:24, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can't move pages without leaving a redirect unless you have the Page mover user right, but if you move a page and want to have the redirect removed you can tag it for speedy deletion. In order to pass WP:GNG there would have to be significant coverage of him in reliable and independent sources; currently, there is no reference in the article that is independent and provides more than trivial information about Batra. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 15:44, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian Pro Music League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Madhav Mahajan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madhav Mahajan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madhav Mahajan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:12, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 11:44, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

You asked for a speedy deletetion but why AbhinavPandeybinnakandi (talk) 12:15, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AbhinavPandeybinnakandi there are multiple reasons and the major one among them are that he clearly is not notable and fails WP:GNG Suryabeej (talk) 12:17, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

THIS IS WELL KNOWN TECAHER AbhinavPandeybinnakandi (talk) 12:24, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]