Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmund Ng

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Robertsky (talk | contribs) at 06:05, 12 June 2021 (→‎Edmund Ng: Closed as Procedural close (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close. Article has been deleted for blatant self-promotion by admin. (non-admin closure) – robertsky (talk) 06:05, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edmund Ng[edit]

Edmund Ng (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

advertising or promotion Chief Minister (Talk) 17:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Chief Minister (Talk) 17:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt, non-notable advertisment already deleted a couple of hours ago for the same reason JW 1961 Talk 17:29, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:52, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:52, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:52, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:52, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural note This is blatant self-promotion and a wholly unsourced BLP to boot. I've speedy deleted and salted until an approved draft is written.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:53, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.