Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dakota Skye (actress)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Chief Minister (Talk) 09:09, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The reasons at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kota Sky (same person apparently) still apply. Fram (talk) 09:09, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets WP:GNG, coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Note that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kota Sky was in 2015, while all the sources are from after 2015. SportsOlympic (talk) 09:11, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with Fram above - what we have added since deletion in 2015 is that she hit her boyfriend and apparently has died (I can't verify that last bit 'cos the Emirates appears to consider the sites 'naughty'). Given that is pretty much a final act, there's little reason to justify this two-line stub will ever be anything else. Hitting people and dying are not in themselves notable - they're two of humanity's favourite things to do. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:46, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You say "there's little reason to justify this two-line stub will ever be anything else" have you take a look at the other pages, for instande fy:Dakota Skye (pornografysk aktrise). Besides of that, coverage in multiple sources is enough for meeting WP:GNG :) SportsOlympic (talk) 12:00, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a single citation or reference in the whole thing, I notes... (though I must say, she had nice clavicles) Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - same rationale as original deletion, does not meet notability criteria. BTW, Alexandermcnabb - over here in the States, that site apparently isn't naughty enough, and she has unfortunately died. Although the current article incorrectly states the cause of death as Covid, which is nowhere mentioned in the source. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:48, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Alexandermcnabb. 2001:569:74D2:A800:2C14:A264:D5CB:C098 (talk) 23:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per SportsOlympic. Meets WP:GNG and has several resources available. --Kirito (talk) 03:10, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Tabloid coverage for slapping her boyfriend. Later on, she died. If that is all one can summarize about a person's life, then no, insufficiently notable to justify an encyclopedic biography. Zaathras (talk) 03:31, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG and the lack of content in the article proves such. Nominations are a dime a dozen. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 04:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep The article may not have many sources right now (4 reliable, 3 of which say mostly the same thing), but just putting "dakota skye" into Google News shows quite a lot of results, though I don't know of their editorial oversight, nor how reliable they are. IMDB is of course WP:USERGENERATED, and should not be used as a reference, but beyond that, this article can possibly be salvaged with a bit of reworking and extra citations. Orcaguy | Write me | Mon œuvre 11:45, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can't just vaguely wave a hand at google hits (which are not at all an indicator of notability), declare "there may be some usable stuff out there somewheres!", and call for keeping the article. If you think there's usable, valid sources, then put in the legwork and attempt to improve the article. Otherwise this "vote" has no merit. Zaathras (talk) 14:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And that's why I gave it a tentative weak keep; I could very well have given it a weak delete as well. I'm not using my comment as a vote, but to provide another perspective for either other editors or the closer. If time allowed for it, I would gladly improve the article, but right now I unfortunately have none. Of course, as the article stands now, I don't think it meets BIO, but multiple reliable sources do seem to exist, and yes I am using vague language here, as I do believe the article has the possibility to be rescued considering the amount of sources available, but I have not yet ascertained whether or not any of it is useful. If you have anything else to add surrounding this, then I suggest leaving it on my talk page instead. Orcaguy | Write me | Mon œuvre 16:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then you should have just made it a comment and not a vote. And as this is a discussion pertaining to the deletion discission, no, it will remain here, not your talk page. Zaathras (talk) 02:54, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She happened to be a legit famous and successful actress, even though she appeared mostly in pornographic films and videos and also, she was a very public person. Maybe this article doesn't have many reliable sources, but you can look for some reliable sources. They are out there. You simply have to know where to look for them. Frschoonover (talk) 01:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Another vague handwave at maybe real, potentially imaginary "sources out there". Zaathras (talk) 02:54, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per SportsOlympic. Meets WP:GNG and has several sources cited. 2600:1700:EBD0:D910:C4D3:A7AB:699B:BE88 (talk) 02:16, 13 June 2021 (UTC) — 2600:1700:EBD0:D910:C4D3:A7AB:699B:BE88 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]