Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One: The Movie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:59, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One: The Movie[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article on a film that does not appear to be notable. The article was originally created by a WP:SPA as an obvious promotional piece, and while most of the overtly promotional portions were cleaned out, it still does not appear to meet the WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. I performed a WP:BEFORE search on the film as well as on some of the individuals involved with its creation, and while I found it listed in directories such as IMDB or mentioned in press releases announcing screenings, I did not find any actual coverage or reviews in reliable, secondary sources. Rorshacma (talk) 18:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 18:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by Nominator - Per below. The handful of reviews found meet the bare minimum of item #1 of WP:NFILM. As no other deletion arguments were made, I will go ahead and withdraw the nomination. Rorshacma (talk) 23:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The RT link in external links was bad, but I have fixed it thanks to the Wayback Machine. The correct RT page lists three reviews that should meet WP:NFO#1. It's not the best article, but enough sources WP:NEXIST to meet notability requirements. For some reason RT doesn't link the Seattle Times piece, but if interested, it can be found here. -2pou (talk) 21:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@2pou: - Thank you very much for this. I actually did try searching Rotten Tomatoes manually to see if reviews existed after seeing the link in the article wasn't working, but I was searching under the full title of "One: The Movie", which the few sources I did see mentioning the movie all referred to it as, and that came up with nothing there. Apparently, its only listed at RT simply as "One", which was a pretty big oversight on my part. Rorshacma (talk) 23:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
-2pou (talk) 23:57, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.