Jump to content

Talk:Dress Act 1746

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 92.12.217.179 (talk) at 14:27, 16 June 2021 (→‎Repeal Act 1782: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconLaw Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconScotland Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Veracity

Is this real? 98 hits on google. May be mythical. Secretlondon 19:11, Nov 9, 2003 (UTC)

looks pretty real to me, appears in print history as well as internet - note actual name of Act in rivised article - dave souza 23:05, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Would it be worth merging and redirecting to Act of Proscription? After all, this wasn't an Act in its own right... Shimgray | talk | 15:46, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Repeal Act 1782

The text of the Repeal Act can be found here:

https://randomscottishhistory.com/2019/03/17/george-iii-21st-year-chapter-63-1782/

It's quite simply worded.

The reported text of the 'proclamation' of the repeal act featured on the main wiki page here looks very suspicious. It doesn't read like a Royal Proclamation, and it may be therefore that's its provenance is a much later, perhaps 19th century, fabrication.