Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hashu Advani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:56, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hashu Advani[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely sourced to self published material. A WP:BEFORE search yielded no sources. Admittedly, this topic may have foreign language references available which I am not able to search for, but as it stands fails WP:SIGCOV 4meter4 (talk) 19:48, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:15, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:15, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He’s clearly notable under WP:NPOL though we’d apparently need a Marathi speaker to find sources. In English there’s this and sources showing that there are public buildings named after him. Mccapra (talk) 05:51, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If he’s notable than produce the sources. Fundamentally we can’t verify content without RS. In order to have an entry we must have sources to back it up. WP:NPOL states this fact in the section “ Applicable policies and guidelines”. So no this article does not pass WP:NPOL without sources that can be produced here for us to evaluate. The article you linked to does not establish SIGCOV either as it’s just one source and it’s only part way about him.4meter4 (talk) 06:12, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Meets WP:NPOL. This source confirms that Advani held two state-level ministerial posts and there could be other Marathi-language sources as well. Additionally, as the subject is from the pre-Internet era, finding sources on the web is not an easy task. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: As per WP:NPOL this source [1] is making him notable. He might fail GNG but it is not a concern for him . 1друг (talk) 16:12, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep elected parliamentary politician, minister in state government; passes NPOL. Less than five minutes of searching turns up RS confirming his positions; *all* election results are available via the Indian Electoral Commission website. AfD is not clean up. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment additional sources at 1, 2 and 3(p.417). Mccapra (talk) 13:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Certainly a notable person having served as cabinet rank minister in a major state of India. Shyamsunder (talk) 12:28, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.