User talk:DiamondIIIXX

Welcome!

Hello, DiamondIIIXX, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GabeIglesia (talk) 10:43, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Cricket

Hi DiamondIIIXX,

Welcome! You are receiving this message because we've noticed your great edits related to our project WikiProject Cricket!. We are a group of editors working on improving articles in the scope of this project, and we need your help to meet the project goals. Please come over to our project page to take a look!

You will see a list of articles that need most improvement .
You will find a group of editors who share similar interest with you.
Overall, this is a friendly place to discuss any issues related to Cricket, ask questions, and collaborate on improving articles on Cricket!

Feel free to put your name on the project member list. Hope you will have fun here, let us know if you need any help! Bobo.03 (talk) 19:56, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DiamondIIIXX. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DiamondIIIXX. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Like your page, very useful as there is a lot of misinformation out there. I note there are a few big projects missing (Gregory, Warhook, Ewerleigh, Edenvale). I am happy to add plus relevant citations. Also could correct a few of the proponents of the ones I know have changed hands. Tobytj (talk) 02:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Badgingarra Wind Farm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page APA Group. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Testing of FlaggedRevs (Pending Changes)

Hi DiamondIIIXX. Back in March, we discussed in #wikipedia-en-help that you were having some issue with edits that were being flagged by the Pending Changes system as needing review, despite you being a member of the Extended Confirmed user group. There have been some changes that may have resolved this issue. Please test these changes by making some edits to pages with Pending Changes protection enabled, and seeing if your edits go through. If you would like to read more about the issue, you can read this Phabricator ticket as well as this other Phabricator ticket. If you get a chance, please let me know on my talk page whether the issue seems to have been fixed. Thanks! Phuzion (talk) 03:05, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of Golf major winners/Grand Slam Tennis winners list

Hi how are you ?. I notice you added a big change to the golf majors winners page regarding a list to match the tennis grand slam winners. The list of major grand slams wins in tennis only includes 276 of the the 473 grand slams that have been staged. Are you going adding the other winners to that page please ?. Why did you change the golf to all on one page was it not better the old way ?. Kind Regards 89.204.237.119 (talk) 10:40, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@89.204.237.119: What slams is the Tennis list missing?

I changed the golf list so it matched the tennis list, (same formatting etc). Also, I moved the list onto the list of champions page, instead of on the majors page (which links to it - the majors page is about the majors themselves, not statistics) DiamondIIIXX (talk) 11:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know that I can see exactly what you have done. Are you finishing the list of players that have won a major in tennis ?. I think the golf pages should have been left separately as they were to be honest 89.204.182.73 (talk) 16:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

what slams are missing? DiamondIIIXX (talk) 20:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On the Champions list section. this list only includes players that have won 3 majors it stops after that. There should be 150 grand slam winners on the tennis list 31.200.176.244 (talk) 10:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did not edit that section, but the reason it stops at 3 is for the sake of readability. Listing every winner is too exhaustive DiamondIIIXX (talk) 11:11, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No it has been done in the golf where 227 different players that have won 457 majors and they are all listed on the page you added too. So if there are only 150 players in tennis to win a major they should be added . It should be a total list like golf. Would you agree ?. 178.167.154.158 (talk) 13:32, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's really required. You can make the change if you want. DiamondIIIXX (talk) 21:33, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't think it is required why because there are 200 slams missing and you don't want to add them ?. But you would mess around with the golf majors page 89.204.189.90 (talk) 21:39, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]