Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danko Jones (EP)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 02:00, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Danko Jones (EP)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable and poorly sourced album. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:48, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:53, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:53, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Has an Allmusic rating/review. Donaldd23 (talk) 12:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - Per WP:NALBUM, "a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography". --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:37, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The Allmusic review is four lines long. That doesn't amount to much, in other words, it's trivial and/or insignificant. Geschichte (talk) 14:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Length is irrelevant as Allmusic rates on a scale of 1 to 5 stars and Allmusic is listed as a reliable source WP:RSMUSIC and has given a 3-star rating to this album. Donaldd23 (talk) 18:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:24, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Donald; are you claiming that Allmusic giving a star with no text also amounts to significant coverage? There are many deletion discussions that say otherwise.. Geschichte (talk) 09:46, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please point to one of those discussions so that I may verify. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:10, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And, it is listed as a reliable source here, with no disqualifier saying the review needs to be a certain length. It says that the star rating is "assigned by the editorial team, not the reviewer"...which means there is editorial oversight and qualifies towards notability. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:14, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I searched the AFD archives for empty Allmusic review and these are some of them: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friday's Child (band) (2nd nomination), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ungrateful, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airborne (band) (2nd nomination).
Just a star with no context does not amount to significant coverage, regardless of who gave it.
Of course, as stated above this review has some text, so I'm actually neutral. Geschichte (talk) 18:58, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Danko Jones discography. Aside from an AllMusic review, there's not enough sources to meet WP:NALBUM. SBKSPP (talk) 05:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lesliechin1 (talk) 23:56, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.