Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MoEngage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NOQUORUM. ✗plicit 10:23, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MoEngage

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

a non notable company filled with Press Releases, announcements or routine coverage. Do not satisfy significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. GermanKity (talk) 06:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 06:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 06:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 06:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:39, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 08:55, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheChronium 07:06, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – I certainly see where the nominator is coming from, and many of these sources may not move the needle in terms of notability. But I think that, e.g., 1, 2, and 3 are probably enough to meet WP:NCORP. They seem to be from reliable and independent sources (Livemint, the Deccan Chronicle, and VentureBeat, respectively), and they go into enough detail about the company and its actions to assuage any WP:CORPDEPTH concerns. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:57, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.