Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruach (Kabbalah)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:14, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ruach (Kabbalah)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this page needs extensive work but bringing it up to WP standards duplicates material already present in more than one place; this article has no real value either as it is or in a reworked form Jenhawk777 (talk) 20:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ~~Support~~ The issue/subject is already covered in-depth and in-width enough on the current huge Kabbalah Portal on WP. It does not need and indeed does not deserve its own separate page. All the content of this article could be a section in the existing article Ruach Hakodesh. That article really needs a lot of work put in it to bring it up to standards and to expand it appropriately. warshy ^(¥¥) 20:50, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:05, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ~~Support~~ per User:warshy. Editor2020 (talk) 02:01, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~ Delete per Editor2020. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:39, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - this AfD has no persons wishing to keep or delete it ("Support" makes no sense in this case). Bearian (talk) 20:06, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Bearian I realize the vote to support seems ambiguous, but having discussed this with all of them on various talk pages, I know they are all votes in support of the proposed deletion. They are votes to delete. This Afd has no votes to keep the article. If you are in doubt, you can easily and quickly go to their talk pages and ask them. Jenhawk777 (talk) 02:54, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - There, that's clear now. Jenhawk777 (talk) 20:27, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article is a rambling content-fork. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 17:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.