Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Igor Ryjenkov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 04:34, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Igor Ryjenkov

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a person with no properly sourced indication of notability. The notability claim here is that he has a job that isn't "inherently" notable for the purposes of securing automatic inclusion rights in Wikipedia, and the sole reference for it is his profile on the self-published website of a directly affiliated organization rather than any evidence of independent third party media coverage about him. Bearcat (talk) 05:18, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless evidence of notability can be found. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:54, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 05:18, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:51, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wine-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:51, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 06:55, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – all I could find is this, which seems to be little more than an interview. Unless I'm missing some sort of actual secondary coverage, he fails the GNG. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.