Talk:Ordinary

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move Ordinary to Ordinary (officer) and Ordinary (disambiguation) to Ordinary. Jafeluv (talk) 11:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

– The religious use of the word "ordinary" is bordering on jargon; it's not familiar to laypeople and doesn't seem likely as a search term -- readers are far more likely to look up titles like "Bishop". With other uses being in heraldry and popular music, I think it highly unlikely that this use is more likely than all the other uses combined to be the one readers are looking for. Powers ^T 22:35, 21 September 2012 (UTC) Powers ^T 22:35, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom WP:JARGON and the other uses are just as likely. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 01:58, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. No clear primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:59, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support, with alternative. What about just Ordinary (officer)? According to the article, there are civic ordinaries, especially in the US. I'll investigate to see if I can add to that aspect of ordinariness. Otherwise, I agree - a peek at stats.grok.se shows that the most popular "Ordinary" article is actually Ordinary (film), but since it is not more popular than the others combined, a dab page is best. Dohn joe (talk) 16:50, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm certainly not attached to my proposed disambiguator. Powers ^T 15:07, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.