User talk:MrOllie

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Superdeterminism reverts by you on Dr. Hansson article

The article by Dr. Hansson is in a reliable physics journal cited by Wiki and noted by Wiki to be a reliable source. You have no factual basis for reverting my changes, because Dr. Hansson's article appearing in a reliable scientific journal cannot be a fringe position. I am warning you to stop reverting my changes under the three revert rule, or I'll report you to Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnbannan (talk • contribs)

I'm still waiting for the report you promised, repetitive threats are boring. - MrOllie (talk) 11:56, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Salvation Army Edits

MrOllie,

You keep taking down Salvation Army Edits that are credible. It's not commentary. Meanwhile the use of language in many articles are indeed commentary and made to make organizations, businesses, individuals look certain ways. Please reinsert my edits. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evan.savage511 (talk • contribs)

No. We follow the sources, and the sources call it a 'church', not a 'cult'. We're not a vehicle to host your personal opinions of this group. - MrOllie (talk) 20:22, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

British cuisine editor

Hi MrOllie, the editor is repeatedly deleting large chunks of British cuisine. I've done 2 reverts today and issued 2 templated warnings, but the editor has resumed after your reversion. I think they need to be reverted again with a final warning, from you or someone new... (it's all they 've done since joining Wikipedia yesterday, not a great start really). All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:05, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Chiswick Chap, They're editing on mobile, there's a decent chance they aren't even seeing the talk page warnings. MrOllie (talk) 12:45, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Pings seem to work well enough on my mobile, but you're right to be cautious. Still, all their edits have been to the one article, they have consisted almost entirely of deletions with a few bytes of addition, and they have repeatedly ignored reverts. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Eben Alexander (author) page

MrOllie,

There is no reliable reference to claim that a "medically-induced coma" is factual. The provided peer-reviewed medical journal reference (The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease) clearly states it was not a medically-induced coma. This is highly misleading to Wikipedia users, who are expecting unbiased facts.

There is no reference to any assertions from myself claiming "brain death," there are plenty of references of my assertions of severe incapacitation of the neocortex.

Following is a correct version of facts:

"Eben Alexander III (born December 11, 1953) is an American neurosurgeon and author. His book Proof of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon's Journey into the Afterlife (2012) describes his near-death experience that happened in 2008 during a coma due to bacterial meningoencephalitis. "His medical records suggest that his coma was not drug- induced, as his brain function and level of consciousness were clearly impaired and on a downward trajectory before sedation and started to improve before sedation was discontinued". [1] He asserts that the coma resulted in severe incapacitation of his neocortex, that consciousness is not only a product of the brain and that this permits access to an afterlife. Alexander has also authored follow-up books."

With reference to [1] https://med.virginia.edu/perceptual-studies/wp-content/uploads/sites/360/2018/09/Greyson_-Alexander-JNMD-2018.pdf

Please return the article to factual information only. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ealexander3 (talk • contribs)

You may take it up on the article talk page, but given your conflict of interest you should not be editing the biography yourself. I don't want to host another repetitive chapter of this debate on my user talk page - this has been explained to you (three times now!) on threads you have started on the BLP noticeboard. - MrOllie (talk) 18:07, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Added article by Hansson

Why did you delete my change? DH39 (talk) 13:45, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Banned users may not continue editing on a new account. If you want to edit Wikipedia, go back and try to get your original account unblocked. - MrOllie (talk) 13:46, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Stop pasting the same question in over and over. - MrOllie (talk) 13:50, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Your reverts

MrOllie - thanks for your time and efforts reviewing my edits, especially since I'm new to it and do make mistakes. I appreciate if you can provide actionable summaries about your reverts (e.g. "Rv unreliable sources / not really on topic for this page" seems subjective), and you're obviously welcome to improve my edits as you see fit. I'll do my part and further study Reliable sources.

psychological safety

Hi, I appreciate your edits on the psych safety page, this isn't a criticism :) The section on the history of it was written in conjunction with Dr Amy Edmondson (canon in psych safety realms) and contained valid, reliable links. If there's a problem with anything you see, please highlight it on the talk page for discussion. Thanks! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomgeraghty (talk • contribs)

No, blog posts and articles about software or business aren't reliable sources for an article about psychology. Also, if you wrote it 'in conjunction with Dr Amy Edmondson' basing whole paragraphs on her work isn't great. See WP:COI. - MrOllie (talk) 12:04, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Such a shame you let your ego get in the way of providing a great resource to the public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomgeraghty (talk • contribs)

I'm not the one edit warring to keep in links to my own website or calling my writing 'crucial' and 'essential'. - MrOllie (talk) 13:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

"my writing" XD Tomgeraghty (talk) 15:31, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Teratornis

May I ask why you reverted my edit to the Teratornis article? --198.84.219.101 (talk) 20:50, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Because it's a fringe position. Mainstream thinking is that Teratornis and humans didn't coexist. - MrOllie (talk) 21:14, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Mrollie.

Listen to me, you are not a great Wikipedian. You revert perfectly normal edits for 0% reason, you really trying to remove IP users?