Jump to content

User talk:HurricaneResearch

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by HurricaneResearch (talk | contribs) at 01:13, 26 September 2021 (Discussion #1 Status: Unactive). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hi I’m HurricaneResearch and this is where you guys can reply to discussions that I make.

Discussion #1 Status: Unactive

This Discussion is over due to lack of people discussing in it. Discussion #2 is gonna be active on 3 October 2021

Discussion #2 Status: Upcoming

This is a upcoming discussion. You can begin discussing on 3 October 2021

September 2021

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Subtropical Storm Teresa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please stop trying to create an article on Teresa! The redirect should remain instead, as an article for this storm is completely unnecessary. Thanks! CycloneYoris talk! 23:00, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! I will keep the redirect but Teresa should have it own Wikipedia article. HurricaneResearch (talk) 23:59, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia's notability guideline. Storms that are not meteorologically notable or notable based on impacts (affected areas, damage, deaths) should not get articles. Wikipedia:WikiProject_Tropical_cyclones#Storm_articles is also helpful if you want to create a storm article. Best, Destroyer (Alternate account) 00:35, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hurricane Sam (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 00:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, HurricaneResearch! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 00:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hurricane Sam (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 01:02, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]