Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 September 27
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < September 26 | << Aug | September | Oct >> | September 28 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
September 27
[edit]04:45:38, 27 September 2021 review of submission by Thernabrongjackie
[edit]
The submission is not contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, but tries to give a brief account and contribution of a living Scientist. A similar page (e.g https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olanike_Adeyemo) exists on Wikipedia, why is my own work an expectation?
Thernabrongjackie (talk) 04:45, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Because that article is both better-sourced and more in-depth than this article. The Google Scholar link also throws a fair bit of cold water on meeting WP:NSCHOLAR for Adiaha. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 14:03, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
05:33:25, 27 September 2021 review of submission by Lazymaverick0210
[edit]I guess it is BIG. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/sushmita-sen-is-elated-as-aarya-gets-international-emmy-nod/articleshow/86482652.cms?from=mdr
Lazymaverick0210 (talk) 05:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Lazymaverick0210: That source is a non-sequitur and doesn't so much as mention them, let alone discuss them at length. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 14:00, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
articles of creation /chronogenetics
[edit]Hi I was informed the article in question has been undeleted for edit . I wanted to find the link but could not. Is it possible anyone has it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Earthoceans (talk • contribs) 07:06, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
10:04:03, 27 September 2021 review of submission by Buddy011
[edit]Would you please advise and enumerate the specific reasons for your comments...I will meanwhilst review all of your articles and look for any issues. Thanks ! Buddy011 (talk) 10:04, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Buddy011: The draft, once you remove all the unsourced biographical claims (including those cited to sources that do not corroborate their claims), is an article about a person whose only real news coverage has been tied to a single event. Per our policies we generally err on the side of privacy and delete/reject such articles. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 13:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Somebody in the United States might be able to answer this – does any of the news reports about the shooting actually mention Mitchell's name? A couple of the sources are locked outside the region where they are published, but the ones I can access only report the exact same information about a man being shot and taken to hospital. --bonadea contributions talk 18:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- A look suggests they do not (they occurred during/shortly after the shooting), so those sources are also completely useless, making this draft effectively completely unsourced. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 15:49, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Lenai1992 (talk) 10:56, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Lenai1992 You don't ask a question, but the draft was blatant advertising. 331dot (talk) 10:59, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
I don't understand how my article looks like a advertisement when actually it is not. SO want the help in how to change the wordings or the sentences which might help the article to be approved.
Akshaypatil510 (talk) 13:18, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Akshaypatil510: It reads like an investment brochure because you're throwing everything at the draft to see what will stick, which makes it come off as promotional in tone. Keep It Simple, Stupid. In addition, your sources are almost all junk; only [1] is anywhere approaching usable. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 13:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
19:33:11, 27 September 2021 review of submission by 216.182.107.104
[edit]
I have created two accounts, tomofidaho and tomsapid. I can log in to tomsapid but can not log into tomofidaho. I don't want two accounts and think I created tomsapid after being unable to log into tomofidaho. Please advise me on how I can delete one of these accounts. I also need to mark myself as a paid editor and don't understand how to accomplish that. thank you in advance for your help. 216.182.107.104 (talk) 19:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
216.182.107.104 (talk) 19:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- It is not possible to delete an account. If you no longer have access to it, just disregard it. I told you how you could declare as a paid editor, a simple statement on your user page. 331dot (talk) 19:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
20:28:04, 27 September 2021 review of submission by Buddy011
[edit]Being attacked by other editors who have limited knowledge on subject Buddy011 (talk) 20:28, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Buddy011 Instead of perceiving things as an "attack", perceive things as people trying to explain how things work here, and what the criteria for an article are. People are trying to help you. They don't need to be experts in the subject matter to do that. Creating a new article is the absolute hardest task to perform on Wikipedia, and you would be wise to heed the advice of others. Your draft was rejected, and will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 20:37, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Buddy011: Nowhere did I attack you. I told you that your sourcing was subpar and, at best, implicated WP:BLP1E. Having re-looked at the sources, I can now say that absolutely none of the sourcing is acceptable, because none of it so much as mentions him by name, let alone discusses him at any length. WP:Biographies of living persons is a mandatory requirement. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 15:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)