User talk:Krehel

Welcome

Hello, Krehel, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Krehel, good luck, and have fun. Aboutmovies (talk) 01:31, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPOV

Please read and understand this basic Wikipedia policy. Articles must be written from a neutral point of view. The edit you made to Race and intelligence replaced neutral language with language that made a definitive and declaratory statement. Such statements can only be made in articles if they are directly supported by citations from reliable sources, which yours was not -- and cannot be, because it is not an accepted fact within the scientific community, but a matter of considerable debate. Please be careful in the future not to make POV edits, and especially not to replace carefully neutral language with non-neutral viewpoints. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 17:33, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Pseudohistory. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 17:35, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Whiteness studies, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 17:25, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]