Jump to content

User talk:Random Redshirt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by PrimeBOT (talk | contribs) at 18:55, 5 October 2021 (Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating to post-1932 American politics and articles: Task 24: removal of a template following a TFD). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Random Redshirt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! TFD (talk) 15:26, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating to post-1932 American politics and articles

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 16:41, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Hell Shaking Street Preachers) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Hell Shaking Street Preachers.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Notability is borderline, as the only article providing more than just mere-mentions is source #5, and even that one has relatively little information about the group. Provide more citations to in-depth coverage of the group to fix this.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed, Rosguill talk 20:54, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hell Shaking Street Preachers for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hell Shaking Street Preachers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hell Shaking Street Preachers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Graywalls (talk) 19:17, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]