Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 September 23

< September 22	September 24 >

September 23

Image:N10VHkathy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: - Delete - whether replaceable or not is moot (though the image may fail NFCC#8) - the image lacks an attributed source and fails NFCC#10a - Peripitus (Talk) 11:46, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:N10VHkathy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gabe777x (notify | contribs).

The helicopter still exists, and that person is still alive, so there probably is the possibility of a free replacement, Lego K^ontribs T^alk M 06:39, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you *sure* that the heliocopter exists in this form and the person is still alive? According to the article it apparently was once included in, Flight For Life (Valley Hospital), one of the flight nurses, Kathy Batterman, was killed in a heliocopter crash in 1999. She may be the person in the picture given the file name. As for the heliocopter, the image was being used to show the paint scheme in 1996. But the article states that the air ambulance service was sold in 2001 to Mercy Air. And the Mercy Air article shows that service uses a different paint scheme entirely for its heliocopters. So even if the heliocopter still exits, it doesn't exist with the Flight for Life paint scheme. (Furthermore, per the FAA website,[1] this particular heliocopter is now registered to a guy in California while Mercy Air is in Colorado, so it is not unlikely that Mercy Air doesn't have it either.) If I'm correct about this-- though I'm sure the person who originally uploaded the image could better explain-- then it is possible that no free image could ever be created to replace this one. Of course, it would be best if the uploader would include this relevant information on the image page. Crypticfirefly (talk) 02:46, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Update: Here's N10VH with its current paint job. [2] [3] Totally different. Crypticfirefly (talk) 03:14, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:3086809.jpg

Image:3086809.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Justin65656 (notify | contribs).

Unencyclopedic, Wikipedia is not a webhost. Lego K^ontribs T^alk M 08:24, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gassaway Killer Web Design.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete. Stifle (talk) 14:49, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gassaway Killer Web Design.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Peter Eisenburger (notify | contribs).

Non-free book cover. As far as I can see, the book isn't even mentioned in the NetObjects Fusion article, except in the "Sources and links" section at the end. This image does not significantly increase the reader's understanding of the topic, so it fails WP:NFCC #8. —Bkell (talk) 12:46, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Better-tex-rendering.png

Image:Better-tex-rendering.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stw (notify | contribs).

Unused, replaceable by math syntax. —Bkell (talk) 13:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not in use, if it would be needed you could simply create a wiki-text formula for it. abf /talk to me/ 15:23, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:She Thinks His Name Was John.jpg

Image:She Thinks His Name Was John.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Caldorwards4 (notify | contribs).

Low quality, blurry. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 16:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TenPoundHammer. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 19:23, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Deleted - minimal fair use rationale, minimal discussion. While discussion of the book cover is not needed to satisfy the NFCCs, substantive discussion of the book it. There should be not prejudice against restoration at such time that usage is justifiable under the nonfree content criteria. Wily D 15:48, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Involution ocean 1977.jpg

Image:Involution ocean 1977.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Crypticfirefly (notify | contribs).

Until we have an article on the book this image is a cover of, or until this cover is discussed critically or somehow adds value a free image couldn't, I don't think we are justified in hosting this copyrighted image. the skomorokh 16:57, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
First edition of first book published by this author, book is discussed in the article, obviously no "free" image of the book cover is available. Crypticfirefly (talk) 23:18, 23 September 2008 (UTC) (For those not following the link-- the book itself is notable as the first novel of Hugo winner Bruce Sterling. Crypticfirefly (talk) 00:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC) )[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Trdefencess.JPG

Image:Trdefencess.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Oguzhantr (notify | contribs).

Unencyclopedic. (Additionally, most images from the uploader have transpired to be copy-vios.) Ian¹³ /t 17:16, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Z5a5a5a.jpg

Image:Z5a5a5a.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Oguzhantr (notify | contribs).

Unencyclopedic. (Additionally, most images from the uploader have transpired to be copy-vios.) Ian¹³ /t 17:16, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unused, unencyclopedic, low-quality. abf /talk to me/ 15:26, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sea zenith.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was:

- Speedy Delete: Copy-vio - Ian¹³/t 19:34, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sea zenith.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Oguzhantr (notify | contribs).

Likely a copy-vio (nearly all images by this user, including all (bar this one) of military objects have been). Ian¹³ /t 17:18, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:BrandNewManB.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Deleted by Peripitus. Stifle (talk) 14:49, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BrandNewManB.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by BigrTex (notify | contribs).

Doesn't add to understanding of the album. Nothing special about this back cover. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:13, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Unionsquarefrommacys.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: - Deleted - commons showing now - Peripitus (Talk) 04:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Unionsquarefrommacys.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by [[User talk:{{{Uploader}}}#Image:Unionsquarefrommacys.jpg listed for deletion|{{{Uploader}}}]] ([{{fullurl:User_talk:{{{Uploader}}}|action=edit&preload=Template:idw_preload&editintro=Template:idw_editintro&section=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify] | [[Special:Contributions/{{{Uploader}}}|contribs]]).

{{{Reason}}} IReceivedDeathThreats (talk) 20:42, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
User told me that this iamage is a duplicate of an image on commons, see here. I can't figure out why the code is b0rked, though. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 23:31, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.