Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 October 18

< October 17	October 19 >

October 18

File:EquinoxAtariProds.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:04, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image licensing says the copyright is owned by the uploader, however what is contained in this image could be copyrighted by someone/something else. UnLeashedWolfie (talk) 03:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:African swine fever virus virion TEM.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:04, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded with credit to "Institute for Animal Health" (now known as the en:Pirbright Institute, an agency of the UK government. Crown Copyright might not apply here but I'm not very familiar with UK copyright.; I was looking for similar images published by them and found https://www.pirbright.ac.uk/asfv which has the note "Pictures copyright The Pirbright Institute. For use of these images please email ...". So I'm not sure if the licensing on this picture is compatible with Wikipeda/Wikimedia. I found and uploaded a similar image from the US Government with clear licensing, so there is already a replacement in place. Ich (talk) 13:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alpha Beta Logo.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Convert to fair use -FASTILY 22:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not a simple logo due to the graphical elements. Copy on Commons was determined to be above the threshold of originality and deleted. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:35, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 00:27, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ashland High School Seal.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Resolved -FASTILY 22:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Complex logo. School website states, "Unlawful copying or use of website content, including photos and graphics, is strictly prohibited." Ixfd64 (talk) 17:38, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to NFUR and keep --Sreejith K (talk) 20:43, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, now that it has been relicensed to a non-free logo. Salavat (talk) 00:28, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Boroondara Eagles FC Emblem.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Resolved -FASTILY 22:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Complex logo, the eagle is definitely not a simple shape. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:39, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to non-free logo, which is valid fair use for it on the team page. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:55, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, mislabelled non-free file so I have relicensed to non-free logo and added a fairuse. Salavat (talk) 00:29, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CAC School map.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from school website. [1] Not a logo as the license indicates. I'm not sure a map qualifies for fair use. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, questionable licensing and no obvious reason why the file is useful if converted to non-free. Salavat (talk) 00:30, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carson Valley Inn logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Resolved -FASTILY 22:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Probably above the threshold of originality as the mountain cannot be described as a simple geometric shape. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:43, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep after I reverted the unexplained change of license by an unregistered user, and the file is now (again) classified as non-free. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:49, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, now that it has been relicensed to a non-free logo. Salavat (talk) 00:31, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chumradio1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama for 2D "graphic works" in Canada. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:46, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AICRA LOGO.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Complex logo, no indication uploader is copyright holder. Only used in draft space. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:00, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless the uploader goes through the OTRS process to verify that they're the copyright holder. I assume they aren't, because a company wouldn't want to make it's logo public domain. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:57, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, questionable licensing and no obvious reason why the file is useful if converted to non-free. Salavat (talk) 00:13, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cartoon Watch Jan 2016 issue.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of copyrighted magazine, no evidence of permission from publisher. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, questionable licensing and no obvious reason why the file is useful if converted to non-free. Salavat (talk) 00:14, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cartoon Character Prince.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scanned from copyrighted magazine, needs permission from publisher. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:16, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, questionable licensing and no obvious reason why the file is useful if converted to non-free. Salavat (talk) 00:14, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.