User talk:Monserrrr
Welcome!
Hi Monserrrr! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Name Omitted (talk) 14:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Edit summaries needed
Hi I've noticed a few of your edits and I'm uncertain as to accuracy. For example this edit appears partly correct and partly incorrect after I read the source. Edit summaries are needed and if you're working from another source then you need to provide that source - otherwise others will check the source that is already there and conclude you are incorrect. Thanks. Invasive Spices (talk) 18:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Im updating taxonomic information on Wikipedia. A lot of it is outdated. Sorry for not sourcing. Monserrrr (talk) 19:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Please use edit summaries. I've seen you working on the List of mammals of ... series and I can't tell why you are making some changes. Edit summaries are part of how Wikipedians communicate and know what is a good change and what is vandalism. Thank you. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 03:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Apologies, I still need to form that habit Monserrrr (talk) 03:35, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 04:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Apologies, I still need to form that habit Monserrrr (talk) 03:35, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Please use edit summaries. I've seen you working on the List of mammals of ... series and I can't tell why you are making some changes. Edit summaries are part of how Wikipedians communicate and know what is a good change and what is vandalism. Thank you. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 03:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Please stop making changes such as this one per WP:NOTBROKEN. Both taxonomy terms are widely used. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:20, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Going off ASM ([1]). Even if both are used, then my edits should not matter. Monserrrr (talk) 01:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Once again, read WP:NOTBROKEN. The edits you are making are disruptive and you will be blocked if you continue. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:34, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Fine. I'll change others which aren't debated. Monserrrr (talk) 01:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
WP:NOTBROKEN (x2)
As User:Ohnoitsjamie said, you are still making edits such as this and this (amongst many others) which are contrary to the principles outlined at WP:NOTBROKEN and which are disruptive.
--Mychemicalromanceisrealemo (talk) 13:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- The edits are NOT disruptive, and the eastern and red wolves have been split off as their own species for a while now. I am updating the taxonomies on these pages. Monserrrr (talk) 14:24, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- In both those cases, we have sources that indicate that both are used. Unless you have good sourcing that establishes that is no longer the case, you need to stop making these changes or else you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Define "good sourcing". Don't be vague. Monserrrr (talk) 15:06, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- In both those cases, we have sources that indicate that both are used. Unless you have good sourcing that establishes that is no longer the case, you need to stop making these changes or else you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)