Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Ackah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:45, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Philip Ackah

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ghana and Oman are both WP:NOTFPL so there's no claim to meeting WP:NFOOTBALL (worth noting that all of the appearances are unverified anyway - none of the stats pages on him seem to list them). Only one tiny transfer announcement in Google News and nothing at all in DDG or ProQuest so there is no evidence of WP:GNG.

References currently in the article are a stats database profile, two transfer announcements with barely any info on him that mostly duplicate each other and an unreliable source relating to Football Manager 2020, a computer game. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:37, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:38, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:38, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:38, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, neither NFOOTY nor GNG.--Mvqr (talk) 11:30, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 22:10, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I cannot find WP:SIGCOV for the subject and as such they don't warrant a standalone article. In addition to the above, I also found similar a WP:ROUTINE article surrounding their transfer here. GauchoDude (talk) 18:16, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.