Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurt Heilbronn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kurt Heilbronn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't believe that he is notable enough - only known for being on Eisenhowers flight crew which I don't think is enough. Fails GNG - the info in this article are from Oral Histories and the Eisenhower papers Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:12, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no indication of notability. MilborneOne (talk) 17:31, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — WP:NOTE, WP:BIO, WP:SOLDIER — Articles sources appear to be good RS for the article statements they presumably support, but do nothing to demonstrate that the individual is “worthy of note” per the above guidelines. — Who R you? Talk 18:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 00:04, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He doesn't appear to have done anything to merit notability, he's just happened to encounter notable people. On that basis, I'd qualify for my own article! RomanSpa (talk) 09:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.