Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZoomInfo
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:08, 31 January 2022 (Added missing end tags to discussion close footer to reduce Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 06:08, 31 January 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Added missing end tags to discussion close footer to reduce Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:21, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- ZoomInfo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:WEB, only one reliable source and no indication of notability therein. --Chris (talk) 18:44, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Appears to be a notable people/job candidate search engine that has received significant coverage in third party reliable sources; more than 500 hits at Google News Archives, many of which are PR releases but others appear to be legitimate news coverage including such articles as these.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] --Arxiloxos (talk) 23:16, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.